Ruby 3D

ruby-talk
1

Hi, I know the answer but I try anyway : is there a well supported Ruby binding to a good 3D engine ?

What I've found is a binding to irrlich which is rather old (2 years) and an obsolete binding to Ogre3D

It's quite strange : why a such good language does have nothing serious when dealing with 3D ? Many interpreted languages does...

Anything I would have missed ?

Thanks !

2

Ruby's threading model makes some of the techniques used problematic.

···

On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Zouplaz wrote:

Hi, I know the answer but I try anyway : is there a well supported Ruby binding to a good 3D engine ?

What I've found is a binding to irrlich which is rather old (2 years) and an obsolete binding to Ogre3D

It's quite strange : why a such good language does have nothing serious when dealing with 3D ? Many interpreted languages does...

Anything I would have missed ?

3

Hi, I know the answer but I try anyway : is there a well supported Ruby binding to a good 3D engine ?

What I've found is a binding to irrlich which is rather old (2 years) and an obsolete binding to Ogre3D

It's quite strange : why a such good language does have nothing serious when dealing with 3D ? Many interpreted languages does...

An updated Ogre3D binding was announced just last month:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/270263

Hope this helps,

Bill

···

From: "Zouplaz" <user@domain.invalid>

4

There is a fairly new and active project called ogre.rb
http://ogrerb.rubyforge.org/

Might want to give it a look.

/Shawn

···

On 10/19/07, Zouplaz <user@domain.invalid> wrote:

Hi, I know the answer but I try anyway : is there a well supported Ruby
binding to a good 3D engine ?

What I've found is a binding to irrlich which is rather old (2 years)
and an obsolete binding to Ogre3D

It's quite strange : why a such good language does have nothing serious
when dealing with 3D ? Many interpreted languages does...

Anything I would have missed ?

Thanks !