Hi everyone,
Does anyone know the general status of Ruby 2.0? I take it's probably a
release time of "when its ready", but thought I'd check.
Also, has YARV officially been announced as the VM for Ruby? As if so,
will it be in the 1.9 or 2.0 release?
Thanks everyone.
-Josh
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
When it's ready, seen rumors of late this year. It's becoming awfully late
already 
And yeah, YARV will be default. It is already in 1.9 and will be default
onwards from there.
These sorts of things traditionally happen on Christmas day.
Phil
On 11/29/07, Josh Ec <eckerman@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know the general status of Ruby 2.0? I take it's probably a
release time of "when its ready", but thought I'd check.Also, has YARV officially been announced as the VM for Ruby? As if so,
will it be in the 1.9 or 2.0 release?
Also, Ruby follows the normal release numbering scheme
Major.Minor.BugFixes
Aka
1.8.6 is the current
When Minor numbers are odd, it's a development release, when Minor numbers
are even, it's a production release.
Thus, the production release of 1.9 will be called 2.0
Jason
On Nov 29, 2007 2:31 PM, Trollen Lord <trollenlord@gmail.com> wrote:
When it's ready, seen rumors of late this year. It's becoming awfully late
alreadyAnd yeah, YARV will be default. It is already in 1.9 and will be default
onwards from there.
Phil Tomson wrote:
On 11/29/07, Josh Ec <eckerman@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know the general status of Ruby 2.0? I take it's probably a
release time of "when its ready", but thought I'd check.Also, has YARV officially been announced as the VM for Ruby? As if so,
will it be in the 1.9 or 2.0 release?These sorts of things traditionally happen on Christmas day.
Phil
Heh. I always wanted a big, red ruby in my stocking.
-Josh
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
Quoth Jason Roelofs:
On Nov 29, 2007 2:31 PM, Trollen Lord <trollenlord@gmail.com> wrote:
> When it's ready, seen rumors of late this year. It's becoming awfully late
> already
>
> And yeah, YARV will be default. It is already in 1.9 and will be default
> onwards from there.
>Also, Ruby follows the normal release numbering scheme
Major.Minor.BugFixes
Aka
1.8.6 is the current
When Minor numbers are odd, it's a development release, when Minor numbers
are even, it's a production release.Thus, the production release of 1.9 will be called 2.0
Jason
I wouldn't say it's "Major.Minor.BugFixes" so much as "Major.SemiMajor.Minor".
After all, 1.8.5 adding non-blocking I/O methods didn't fix *bugs* in the
interpreter.
Regards,
--
Konrad Meyer <konrad@tylerc.org> http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/
No, Matz announced on ruby-core some time ago that this has changed.
It's the existence of a teeny number which indicates stability.
The production (actually I think it would be more proper to call it
functionally stable) release of 1.9 will be 1.9.1 (or maybe 1.9.0) and
will be released on Christmas of 2007.
2.0 will shortly thereafter be the experimental version.
On Nov 29, 2007 3:01 PM, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 2:31 PM, Trollen Lord <trollenlord@gmail.com> wrote:
> When it's ready, seen rumors of late this year. It's becoming awfully late
> already
>
> And yeah, YARV will be default. It is already in 1.9 and will be default
> onwards from there.
>Also, Ruby follows the normal release numbering scheme
Major.Minor.BugFixes
Aka
1.8.6 is the current
When Minor numbers are odd, it's a development release, when Minor numbers
are even, it's a production release.Thus, the production release of 1.9 will be called 2.0
--
Rick DeNatale
My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
