I installed Ruby 1.9.1 on OSX Tiger using MacPorts.
Then I installed Rubygems into the new installation (by running the
setup.rb after changing my path to point to the new ruby executable).
Any gems that I install install fine and show up in 'gem list --local'
...and I verified that they are in the gems location in the ruby 1.9
installation. But I am unable to load them using:
You're supposed to load by filename within the gems, rather than put the
gem name itself. For example, gem install SqlStatement, then require
'sqlstatement'
--Ken
···
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:23:11 -0500, Mark Fraser wrote:
Hello,
I installed Ruby 1.9.1 on OSX Tiger using MacPorts.
Then I installed Rubygems into the new installation (by running the
setup.rb after changing my path to point to the new ruby executable).
Any gems that I install install fine and show up in 'gem list --local'
..and I verified that they are in the gems location in the ruby 1.9
installation. But I am unable to load them using:
require 'rubygems'
require '<gemname>'
('no such file to load -- <gemname>').
Any suggestions on what I may be missing?
thanks
--
Chanoch (Ken) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology. http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/
I installed Ruby 1.9.1 on OSX Tiger using MacPorts.
Then I installed Rubygems into the new installation (by running the
setup.rb after changing my path to point to the new ruby executable).
Any gems that I install install fine and show up in 'gem list --local'
...and I verified that they are in the gems location in the ruby 1.9
installation. But I am unable to load them using:
require 'rubygems'
require '<gemname>'
('no such file to load -- <gemname>').
Any suggestions on what I may be missing?
thanks
1.9.1 comes with Ruby Gems, you shouldn't have to install it separately. I would guess you overwrote the 1.9.1 gem stuff.