When I run the following in the irb session, I am getting an error.
Any ideas why? TIA.
irb(main):036:0> { :a => 1, :b => 4 }
=> {:a=>1, :b=>4}
irb(main):037:0> { :x 2, :y 6 }
SyntaxError: (irb):37: syntax error, unexpected tINTEGER, expecting
tASSOC
{ :x 2, :y 6 }
^
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb/workspace.rb:81:in
`eval'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb/workspace.rb:81:in
`evaluate'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb/context.rb:219:in
`evaluate'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb.rb:150:in `block (2
levels) in eval_input'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb.rb:259:in
`signal_status'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb.rb:147:in `block in
eval_input'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb/ruby-lex.rb:244:in
`block (2 levels) in each_top_level_statement'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb/ruby-lex.rb:231:in
`loop'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb/ruby-lex.rb:231:in
`block in each_top_level_statement'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb/ruby-lex.rb:230:in
`catch'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb/ruby-lex.rb:230:in
`each_top_level_statement'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb.rb:146:in `eval_input'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb.rb:70:in `block in
start'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb.rb:69:in `catch'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.0/irb.rb:69:in `start'
from /Users/bparanj/ruby19/bin/irb:13:in `<main>'
Maybe IRB bug!!
Hi --
···
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, bparanj@gmail.com wrote:
When I run the following in the irb session, I am getting an error.
Any ideas why? TIA.
irb(main):036:0> { :a => 1, :b => 4 }
=> {:a=>1, :b=>4}
irb(main):037:0> { :x 2, :y 6 }
SyntaxError: (irb):37: syntax error, unexpected tINTEGER, expecting
tASSOC
{ :x 2, :y 6 }
^
You mean:
{ x: 2, y: 6 }
David
--
Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light:
ADVANCING WITH RAILS April 14-17 New York City
INTRO TO RAILS June 9-12 Berlin
ADVANCING WITH RAILS June 16-19 Berlin
See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!
bparanj@gmail.com wrote:
When I run the following in the irb session, I am getting an error.
Any ideas why? TIA.
irb(main):036:0> { :a => 1, :b => 4 }
=> {:a=>1, :b=>4}
irb(main):037:0> { :x 2, :y 6 }
SyntaxError: (irb):37: syntax error, unexpected tINTEGER, expecting
tASSOC
{ :x 2, :y 6 }
^
I think you're confusing symbol hash keys with 1.9's named arguments:
foo(:a => 1, :b => 2) # symbol hash keys
foo(a:1, b:2) # 1.9 named arguments
···
--
RMagick: http://rmagick.rubyforge.org/
RMagick 2: http://rmagick.rubyforge.org/rmagick2.html
Is this what you were trying to do?
$ irb1.9
irb(main):001:0> {x: 2, y: 6}
=> {:x=>2, :y=>6}
···
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 2:20 PM, bparanj@gmail.com <bparanj@gmail.com> wrote:
When I run the following in the irb session, I am getting an error.
Any ideas why? TIA.
irb(main):036:0> { :a => 1, :b => 4 }
=> {:a=>1, :b=>4}
irb(main):037:0> { :x 2, :y 6 }
SyntaxError: (irb):37: syntax error, unexpected tINTEGER, expecting
tASSOC
{ :x 2, :y 6 }
^
--
Rick DeNatale
My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Hi --
When I run the following in the irb session, I am getting an error.
Any ideas why? TIA.
irb(main):036:0> { :a => 1, :b => 4 }
=> {:a=>1, :b=>4}
irb(main):037:0> { :x 2, :y 6 }
SyntaxError: (irb):37: syntax error, unexpected tINTEGER, expecting
tASSOC
{ :x 2, :y 6 }
^I think you're confusing symbol hash keys with 1.9's named arguments:
foo(:a => 1, :b => 2) # symbol hash keys
foo(a:1, b:2) # 1.9 named arguments
They're still symbols in a hash, though. Just the notation is
different:
irb(main):004:0> def x(a); p a; end
=> nil
irb(main):005:0> x(x: 1, y: 2)
{:x=>1, :y=>2}
David
···
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Tim Hunter wrote:
bparanj@gmail.com wrote:
--
Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light:
ADVANCING WITH RAILS April 14-17 New York City
INTRO TO RAILS June 9-12 Berlin
ADVANCING WITH RAILS June 16-19 Berlin
See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!
David A. Black wrote:
They're still symbols in a hash, though. Just the notation is
different:
I see. Thanks for explaining.
···
--
RMagick: http://rmagick.rubyforge.org/
RMagick 2: http://rmagick.rubyforge.org/rmagick2.html