See bellow code please.
1 obj1 = "object1"
2 obj2 = "object2"
3 obj3 = "object3"
4
5 arr1 = Array.new
6 arr2 = Array.new
7
8 arr1 << obj1
9 arr1 << obj2
10
11 arr2 << obj3
12
13 puts "<arr1>"
14 arr1.each {
15 | element |
16 puts element
17 }
18
19 puts "<arr2>"
20 arr2.each {
21 | element |
22 puts element
23 }
24
25 arr1.push( arr2 )
26 puts "<arr1 << arr2>"
27 arr1.each {
28 | element |
29 puts element
30 }
31
32 arr2.clear
33 puts "<arr2.clear>"
34
35 puts "<arr2>"
36 arr2.each {
37 | element |
38 puts element
39 }
40
41 puts "<arr1>"
42 arr1.each {
43 | element |
44 puts element
45 }
result is...
<arr1>
object1
object2
<arr2>
object3
<arr1 << arr2>
object1
object2
object3
<arr2.clear>
<arr2>
<arr1>
object1
object2
In the last list of arr1, there's no object3. Why? Does Array#push()
method append the array as a refrence? If so, why it does? And after
arr2 had been cleared, I still can access to 3rd member of arr1 without
exceptions or errors.
Yes, I can use clone() method for Array#push. But before, I hope to
know the reason why RUBY's Array#push method works like above.
Thanks.
inspect will give you the answer:
1 obj1 = "object1"
2 obj2 = "object2"
3 obj3 = "object3"
4
5 arr1 = Array.new
6 arr2 = Array.new
7
8 arr1 << obj1
9 arr1 << obj2
10
11 arr2 << obj3
12
13 puts "<arr1>"
14 puts arr1.inspect
-> [ "object1", "object2" ]
19 puts "<arr2>"
20 puts arr2.inspect
-> [ "object3" ]
25 arr1.push( arr2 )
26 puts "<arr1 << arr2>"
27 puts arr1.inspect
-> [ "object1", "object2", [ "object3* ] ]
# notice that the third Element of arr1 is not obj3, but arr2!
32 arr2.clear
# fine, emptying arr2...
33 puts "<arr2.clear>"
34
35 puts "<arr2>"
36 puts arr2.inspect
->
41 puts "<arr1>"
42 puts arr1.inspect
-> [ "object1", "object2", [ ] ]
# the third Element of arr1 is still arr2, it just has been cleared,
# so not a trace of obj3...
Yes, I can use clone() method for Array#push. But before, I hope to
know the reason why RUBY's Array#push method works like above.
...or you could do:
25 arr1.concat( arr2 )
-> [ "object1", "object2", "object3" ]
for any questions like that: try irb - I can only recommend it..
hth
Hannes
···
On 3/8/06, hongseok.yoon@gmail.com <hongseok.yoon@gmail.com> wrote:
In the last list of arr1, there's no object3. Why? Does Array#push()
method append the array as a refrence?
Yes, array elements are just references to objects pretty much in the same
way a variable points to an object. In your case, when you push arr2 into
arr1, what you're doing is making the 3rd element of the array be a
reference to the object pointed to by the variable arr2:
irb(main):006:0> arr1 =
=>
irb(main):007:0> arr2 =
=>
irb(main):008:0> arr1 << "object1"
=> ["object1"]
irb(main):009:0> arr1 << "object2"
=> ["object1", "object2"]
irb(main):010:0> arr2 << "object3"
=> ["object3"]
irb(main):011:0> arr1.push(arr2)
=> ["object1", "object2", ["object3"]]
irb(main):015:0> arr2.object_id # <==== arr2 and arr1[2] point to the
same object
=> 22439224
irb(main):018:0> arr1[2].object_id
=> 22439224
If so, why it does? And after
arr2 had been cleared, I still can access to 3rd member of arr1 without
exceptions or errors.
The call to arr2.clear() clears the contents of the array object referenced
by arr2, which happens to be the same array the 3rd element of arr1 points
to:
irb(main):012:0> arr2.clear
=>
irb(main):013:0> arr1
=> ["object1", "object2", ]
The 3rd element is still in arr1, but now it just points to an empty array.
Hope this helps,
Martin
Changing your code to output the actual arrays:
obj1 = "object1"
obj2 = "object2"
obj3 = "object3"
arr1 = Array.new
arr2 = Array.new
arr1 << obj1
arr1 << obj2
arr2 << obj3
puts "<arr1>"
p arr1
puts "<arr2>"
p arr2
arr1.push( arr2 )
puts "<arr1 << arr2>"
p arr1
arr2.clear
puts "<arr2.clear>"
puts "<arr2>"
p arr2
puts "<arr1>"
p arr1
gives you:
<arr1>
["object1", "object2"]
<arr2>
["object3"]
<arr1 << arr2>
["object1", "object2", ["object3"]]
<arr2.clear>
<arr2>
<arr1>
["object1", "object2", ]
which should give you a hint as to what's going on.
Pete Yandell
This is because arr1 is storing a _reference_ to arr2. If you want to
avoid this behaviour you could use any of the following:
arr1 += arr2 (generates new array, old arr1 is now garbage)
arr1 << arr2.dup (copies arr2, the copy is stored as an element of
arr1)
(arr1 << arr2).flatten! (ideal, but most verbose)
The first two generate new objects. I believe the third doesn't (I may
be wrong). Take your pick.
In Message-Id: <1141814974.021092.267550@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
"Timothy Goddard" <interfecus@gmail.com> writes:
(arr1 << arr2).flatten! (ideal, but most verbose)
The first two generate new objects. I believe the third doesn't (I may
be wrong). Take your pick.
Or use Array#concat to concatenate two arrays destructively.
irb(main):001:0> a1 = [0, 1, 2]
=> [0, 1, 2]
irb(main):002:0> a2 = [3, 4, 5]
=> [3, 4, 5]
irb(main):003:0> a1.concat(a2)
=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
irb(main):004:0> a1
=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
···
--
kjana@dm4lab.to March 9, 2006
Dreams come true --- excepting yours.