Restricting view to source code with RDOC?

Hi -

I'd like to generate some docuementation using RDOC, but don't want any of the "source" links available.

I've seen some existing rdoc that does this, but don't see an option within rdoc itself to exclude them.

Am I just missing it?

Thanks!

-philip

Philip Hallstrom wrote:

I'd like to generate some docuementation using RDOC, but don't want any
of the "source" links available.

I've seen some existing rdoc that does this, but don't see an option
within rdoc itself to exclude them.

Am I just missing it?

I've just had a quick look, and this might work:

Use the --inline-source switch, and use a stylesheet modified with
"a.source-toggle{display:none}" to hide the links.

Cheers,
Dave

I'd like to generate some docuementation using RDOC, but don't want any of the "source" links available.

I've seen some existing rdoc that does this, but don't see an option within rdoc itself to exclude them.

Am I just missing it?

Turns out I was. Naturally after asking I find it :slight_smile: Buried deep in /usr/local/lib/ruby/..... were the rdoc templates. I borrowed html.rb and tore out the pieces that include the links to source.

Seems to work great.

Heh. :slight_smile:

Philip Hallstrom wrote:

I'd like to generate some docuementation using RDOC, but don't want
any of the "source" links available.

I've seen some existing rdoc that does this, but don't see an option
within rdoc itself to exclude them.

Am I just missing it?

Turns out I was. Naturally after asking I find it :slight_smile: Buried deep in
/usr/local/lib/ruby/..... were the rdoc templates. I borrowed html.rb
and tore out the pieces that include the links to source.

Seems to work great.

Heh. :slight_smile:

You're not going to add a --no-source switch to rdoc and share the patch?

Cheers,
Dave

Philip Hallstrom wrote:

I'd like to generate some docuementation using RDOC, but don't want
any of the "source" links available.

I've seen some existing rdoc that does this, but don't see an option
within rdoc itself to exclude them.

Am I just missing it?

Turns out I was. Naturally after asking I find it :slight_smile: Buried deep in
/usr/local/lib/ruby/..... were the rdoc templates. I borrowed html.rb
and tore out the pieces that include the links to source.

Seems to work great.

Heh. :slight_smile:

You're not going to add a --no-source switch to rdoc and share the patch?

Sorry, I wasn't clear. html.rb is just a template (ie. --template) ... in /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/generators/template/html along with some others:

% ls
hefss.rb html.rb kilmer.rb old_html.rb one_page_html.rb

I took html.rb and searched for "source" and just removed every mention of it I could find...

-philip

I think Dave's point was that it is still ruby code which I imagine
you could add an if statement to which would optionally add the source
if a certain variable was setup somewhere (i.e. based on a
command-line switch.)

Ryan

ยทยทยท

On 5/2/06, Philip Hallstrom <ruby@philip.pjkh.com> wrote:

> You're not going to add a --no-source switch to rdoc and share the patch?

Sorry, I wasn't clear. html.rb is just a template (ie. --template) ... in
/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/generators/template/html along with some
others:

% ls
hefss.rb html.rb kilmer.rb old_html.rb one_page_html.rb

I took html.rb and searched for "source" and just removed every mention of
it I could find...