Hi, thanks to the Shebang my /usr/local/somewhere/over/the/rainbow.rb get ruby interpretor launched automagically.
BUT, because I need it very often I've created a /usr/local/bin/rainbow symlink to it.
Now, the require in rainbow.rb no more finds the files in /usr/local/somewhere/over/the/lib directory. So, I used absolute path and it's fine, but francky I don't like absolute paths because anybody should be able to put and use rainbow.rb on any directory
How can I do to have both this nice symlink without losing relative require ?
You could try to construct the "real" path with the help of
File.symlink? and File.readlink.
Personally, I wouldn't bother. There are a couple of install options
that, depending on the situation, make much more sense and
are less brittle:
1) If you want to make install convenient for other Ruby developers,
make a gem. (And if they don't like a gem they'll know how to unpack
it and scatter the files all over their harddrives anyway they please.)
2) If you want to distribute to Linux/Unix users in general, make
a deb or RPM or whatever package.
3) If you want to give the program to people who have little
computer knowledge, try RubyScript2Exe
(http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/rubyscript2exe/\). That packs
everything into a single clickable executable.
Stefan
···
2008/11/9 Zouplaz <user@domain.invalid>:
Hi, thanks to the Shebang my /usr/local/somewhere/over/the/rainbow.rb get
ruby interpretor launched automagically.
BUT, because I need it very often I've created a /usr/local/bin/rainbow
symlink to it.
Now, the require in rainbow.rb no more finds the files in
/usr/local/somewhere/over/the/lib directory. So, I used absolute path and
it's fine, but francky I don't like absolute paths because anybody should be
able to put and use rainbow.rb on any directory
How can I do to have both this nice symlink without losing relative require
Thanks, I'll give File.readlink a look - You're right about using an adequate packaging solution, except that the final user is me This is for a program that I often upgrade and which is runned on 2 machines having different directory structures - I would like to avoid the tedious task of modifying the source after every upgrade
···
le 09/11/2008 21:47, Stefan Lang nous a dit:
Personally, I wouldn't bother. There are a couple of install options
that, depending on the situation, make much more sense and
are less brittle:
1) If you want to make install convenient for other Ruby developers,
make a gem. (And if they don't like a gem they'll know how to unpack
it and scatter the files all over their harddrives anyway they please.)
2) If you want to distribute to Linux/Unix users in general, make
a deb or RPM or whatever package.
3) If you want to give the program to people who have little
computer knowledge, try RubyScript2Exe
(http://www.erikveen.dds.nl/rubyscript2exe/\). That packs
everything into a single clickable executable.
There are projects like hoe that automate the creation of a gem for
you - you could combine that with a rake task that installs the newly
created gem on both your machines every time you make one.
martin
···
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Zouplaz <user@domain.invalid> wrote:
Thanks, I'll give File.readlink a look - You're right about using an
adequate packaging solution, except that the final user is me This is
for a program that I often upgrade and which is runned on 2 machines having
different directory structures - I would like to avoid the tedious task of
modifying the source after every upgrade
This is for a program that I often upgrade and which is runned on 2 machines having different directory structures - I would like to avoid the tedious task of modifying the source after every upgrade