We're having a discussion on Ruby Core about how to speed up CSV. I'm trying to tune a Regexp that matches CSV fields. However, I'm seeing something I don't expect. Can someone explain this to me, please?
That's a simplified version of what I'm messing with. My question is, why does it only match once, when I expect two matches?
The first match should be right at the beginning, and is basically (?:^ ... )(?: ... ([^",]*)). The second match should begin at the comma, being (?: ... ,)(?: ... ([^",]*)). What am I missing?
I'm not pretending to be a regexp guru, but nonetheless:
scan moves forward one character even if the portion of the string that it
matched has length 0. This is to prevent it from going into an infinite
loop. Consider your example: the regexp matches at the start of the string,
and matches 0 characters. If for the next match, Ruby has not moved forward
one character, the regexp would match at the start of the string again in
exactly the same way and still have not matched anything of the string.
My suggestion would be to have two regexps, one to strip off the beginning
of the CSV line, and one to split the remainder into parts.
Peter
···
On 10/30/05, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
We're having a discussion on Ruby Core about how to speed up CSV.
I'm trying to tune a Regexp that matches CSV fields. However, I'm
seeing something I don't expect. Can someone explain this to me,
please?
That's a simplified version of what I'm messing with. My question
is, why does it only match once, when I expect two matches?
The first match should be right at the beginning, and is basically
(?:^ ... )(?: ... ([^",]*)). The second match should begin at the
comma, being (?: ... ,)(?: ... ([^",]*)). What am I missing?
-----Original Message-----
From: James Edward Gray II [mailto:james@grayproductions.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:27 AM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Regexp Guru Needed
...
Thanks for the link Martin. I hadn't found it before. I tried it out, and, it's a nice "free" alternative to RegexBuddy; however, it pales in comparison to what RB can do. I do wish RB was a little cheaper - I've bought much richer software for less money.
--Steve
···
On Nov 2, 2005, at 4:42 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
Stephen Waits <steve@waits.net> wrote:
Check out RegexBuddy. Worth getting access to Win32 just for this if
you're a Mac guy needing to debug some REs.