[RCR] Object#blank?

ruby-talk
1

After some pretty even pro v. con discussion on RedHanded [1], I've moved the vote to the official RCR site [2].

I present the other popular alternatives in the RCR. So, should this one fail, hopefully we will still be left with a victor. But I trust my groomed steed will prevail!!

_why

[1] http://redhanded.hobix.com/inspect/objectBlank.html#comments
[2] http://rcrchive.net/rcr/show/295

2

I can't believe people don't like "vapid?"... it's such a great name!

Cheers,
Navin.

···

why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@whytheluckystiff.net> wrote:

After some pretty even pro v. con discussion on RedHanded [1], I've
moved the vote to the official RCR site [2].

I present the other popular alternatives in the RCR. So, should this
one fail, hopefully we will still be left with a victor. But I trust my
groomed steed will prevail!!

3

* why the lucky stiff (Mar 07, 2005 10:50):

After some pretty even pro v. con discussion on RedHanded [1], I've
moved the vote to the official RCR site [2].

How about Float#nan?? Makes more sense than having 0 as blank, but
perhaps isn't as useful,
  nikolai

···

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}