RCR #138 status?

ruby-talk
1

Hi all,

After reading Michael Neumann's blog
(http://www.ntecs.de/blog/Blog/PythonDecorators.rdoc), I was wondering
what the status of RCR #138 was?

Here's the diff:

--- eval.c 2 Aug 2004 08:52:53 -0000 1.686
  +++ eval.c 16 Aug 2004 12:52:28 -0000
  @@ -3701,7 +3701,7 @@
                  rb_add_method(rb_singleton_class(ruby_class),
                                node->nd_mid, defn, NOEX_PUBLIC);
              }
  - result = Qnil;
  + result = ID2SYM(node->nd_mid);
          }
          break;

RCR 138 can be found at http://rcrchive.net/rcr/RCR/RCR138

This seems like a nifty thing to have in 1.8.2. Any thoughts?

Dan

2

Hi --

···

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Daniel Berger wrote:

Hi all,

After reading Michael Neumann's blog
(http://www.ntecs.de/blog/Blog/PythonDecorators.rdoc\), I was wondering
what the status of RCR #138 was?

Here's the diff:

--- eval.c 2 Aug 2004 08:52:53 -0000 1.686
  +++ eval.c 16 Aug 2004 12:52:28 -0000
  @@ -3701,7 +3701,7 @@
                  rb_add_method(rb_singleton_class(ruby_class),
                                node->nd_mid, defn, NOEX_PUBLIC);
              }
  - result = Qnil;
  + result = ID2SYM(node->nd_mid);
          }
          break;

RCR 138 can be found at RCR::RCR138 - RCRchive home

This seems like a nifty thing to have in 1.8.2. Any thoughts?

From the RCR process point of view, it's one of the legacy ones from
Ruby Garden, which need to be resubmitted in the new format.

David

--
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net

3

djberg96@hotmail.com (Daniel Berger) wrote in message news:<6e613a32.0408161653.733b5b96@posting.google.com>...

RCR 138 can be found at RCR::RCR138 - RCRchive home

This seems like a nifty thing to have in 1.8.2. Any thoughts?

that would be wonderful, please resubmit the rcr and I'll run to vote it.
BTW you may wish to modify the return values of public/privatre/protected so that

memoize \
private \
synchronized def foo
...
end

is the same that
private\
memoize\
synchronized def foo
..
end

4

djberg96@hotmail.com (Daniel Berger) wrote in message news:<6e613a32.0408161653.733b5b96@posting.google.com>...

RCR 138 can be found at RCR::RCR138 - RCRchive home

This seems like a nifty thing to have in 1.8.2. Any thoughts?

that would be wonderful, please resubmit the rcr and I'll run to vote it.
BTW you may wish to modify the return values of public/privatre/protected so that

memoize \
private \
synchronized def foo
...
end

is the same that
private\
memoize\
synchronized def foo
..
end