Railless ActiveRecord

Hey all. More ActiveRecord trouble.

So I have my ActiveRecord connection. All is good. I am connecting to an SQLite3 database, which is working out pretty well for me. I think.

So my story is this: When I tried to use the table "characters", abstracted from class Character, I get an error:
`table_structure': ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid (ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid)

I did some poking around and actually read the error message, and I'm getting this error because there is no table characters (right??)
So how do I create these tables in ActiveRecord?

Thanks,
aRi
--------------------------------------------|
If you're not living on the edge,
then you're just wasting space.

I show how to do this on page 2 of my "How to build simple console
apps with Ruby and ActiveRecord" article

See the ActiveRecord::Schema documentation for more help.

···

On 7/31/07, Ari Brown <ari@aribrown.com> wrote:

Hey all. More ActiveRecord trouble.

So I have my ActiveRecord connection. All is good. I am connecting to
an SQLite3 database, which is working out pretty well for me. I think.

So my story is this: When I tried to use the table "characters",
abstracted from class Character, I get an error:
`table_structure': ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid
(ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid)

I did some poking around and actually read the error message, and I'm
getting this error because there is no table characters (right??)
So how do I create these tables in ActiveRecord?

Rails uses something called migrations.
A migration is a Ruby file that changes the database schema.
It is basically a Ruby transliteration of SQL and can include SQL for things ActiveRecord doesn't support directly.
I haven't yet used AR outside of Rails (but want to!)
Rails includes Rake (Ruby make) tasks specifically for running migrations or removing them. Migrations can be done incrementally. You can also use the Rails console to fiddle with the db via activerecord, but I don't know if you can access the Rails console (basically it is irb on Rails crack) outside of a Rails setting.
If you get stuck with AR look at api.rubyonrails.com
it is the docs for all of Rails, but ActiveRecord is a big part of that.
And do pick up the AWDWR book because a large chunk of it is all about Active Record and is really useful as a reference.

···

On Jul 31, 2007, at 9:37 PM, Ari Brown wrote:

Hey all. More ActiveRecord trouble.

So I have my ActiveRecord connection. All is good. I am connecting to an SQLite3 database, which is working out pretty well for me. I think.

So my story is this: When I tried to use the table "characters", abstracted from class Character, I get an error:
`table_structure': ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid (ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid)

I did some poking around and actually read the error message, and I'm getting this error because there is no table characters (right??)
So how do I create these tables in ActiveRecord?

Thanks,
aRi
--------------------------------------------|
If you're not living on the edge,
then you're just wasting space.

FWIW, I'm also using ActiveRecord outside of Rails, it might help to look through my examples, including how I handle my migrations:

https://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/browser/trunk/lib/puppet/rails.rb
https://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/browser/trunk/lib/puppet/rails

Note that my usage of ActiveRecord seems to spawn a new connection on every request, which I can't seem to fix.

···

On Jul 31, 2007, at 9:37 PM, Ari Brown wrote:

Hey all. More ActiveRecord trouble.

So I have my ActiveRecord connection. All is good. I am connecting to an SQLite3 database, which is working out pretty well for me. I think.

  --
  If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee --
  that will do them in. -- Bradley's Bromide
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com

Thanks! The ActiveRecord::Schema part was what I needed.

I'm fairly certain I'm blind, because I was scouring your page for that and found nothing.

~ Ari
English is like a pseudo-random number generator - there are a bajillion rules to it, but nobody cares.

···

On Jul 31, 2007, at 10:50 PM, Gregory Brown wrote:

I show how to do this on page 2 of my "How to build simple console
apps with Ruby and ActiveRecord" article

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/ruby/2007/06/21/how-to-build-simple-console-apps-with-ruby-and-activerecord.html?page=2

See the ActiveRecord::Schema documentation for more help.

Also, is there anything special I need to do when creating a column that I'm using has_many on?

Thanks,
aRi
-------------------------------------------|
Nietzsche is my copilot

Luke-

  Do you have ActiveRecord::Base.allow_concurrency = true ? If so AR uses one database connection per thread so I assume you have a multithreaded server. The way to get rid of old connections is to call ActiveRecord::Base.verify_active_connections! every 10-20 requests. It will cleanup all the old connections whos threads have finished.

Cheers-
-- Ezra Zygmuntowicz-- Founder & Ruby Hacker
-- ez@engineyard.com
-- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting
-- (866) 518-YARD (9273)

···

On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Luke Kanies wrote:

On Jul 31, 2007, at 9:37 PM, Ari Brown wrote:

Hey all. More ActiveRecord trouble.

So I have my ActiveRecord connection. All is good. I am connecting to an SQLite3 database, which is working out pretty well for me. I think.

FWIW, I'm also using ActiveRecord outside of Rails, it might help to look through my examples, including how I handle my migrations:

https://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/browser/trunk/lib/puppet/rails.rb
https://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/browser/trunk/lib/puppet/rails

Note that my usage of ActiveRecord seems to spawn a new connection on every request, which I can't seem to fix.

Yes.
given tables, say:
categories
stories

If a category has_many :stories
then table stories should have a column named category_id

Generally, this association is followed with story belongs_to :category for a one to many relationship.
There are also one to one relationships using has_one and belongs_to

Active Record (and Rails in general from that) uses a very clever system of English pluralization for table names and associations rely on singular/plural rules.

···

On Jul 31, 2007, at 10:18 PM, Ari Brown wrote:

Also, is there anything special I need to do when creating a column that I'm using has_many on?

Thanks,
aRi
-------------------------------------------|
Nietzsche is my copilot

I do have concurrency set to be allowed, and yes, I'm using a multithreaded server.

I didn't know about the verify method, so I'll check that out. Thanks!

···

On Aug 1, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:

Do you have ActiveRecord::Base.allow_concurrency = true ? If so AR uses one database connection per thread so I assume you have a multithreaded server. The way to get rid of old connections is to call ActiveRecord::Base.verify_active_connections! every 10-20 requests. It will cleanup all the old connections whos threads have finished.

  --
  Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
  Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by
  definition, not smart enough to debug it.
          -- (attributed to) Brian W. Kernighan (unconfirmed)
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com

Thanks! What do I do if I have:

has_many :platypi?

Just kidding,
Thanks,
Ari
--------------------------------------------|
If you're not living on the edge,
then you're just wasting space.

···

On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:04 AM, John Joyce wrote:

Yes.
given tables, say:
categories
stories

If a category has_many :stories
then table stories should have a column named category_id

Generally, this association is followed with story belongs_to :category for a one to many relationship.
There are also one to one relationships using has_one and belongs_to

Active Record (and Rails in general from that) uses a very clever system of English pluralization for table names and associations rely on singular/plural rules.

> Active Record (and Rails in general from that) uses a very clever
> system of English pluralization for table names and associations
> rely on singular/plural rules.

Thanks! What do I do if I have:

has_many :platypi?

Inflector.inflections do |inflect|
   inflect.irregular 'platypus', 'platypi'
end

Just kidding,

Doh!

btw Gregory Brown's article is very good.

···

--
Giles Bowkett

Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com
Portfolio: http://www.gilesgoatboy.org

Ari,
You will be surprised how often the inflector is right about plurals /singulars, but given the number of oddballs in English, it's often better to just choose something that pluralizes easily rather than writing inflection rules. If you wanted to use another language, say japanese which does actually have plural forms that are rarely used or needed, you could define your pluralization rules to end in the appropriate ending.

···

On Aug 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Ari Brown wrote:

On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:04 AM, John Joyce wrote:

Yes.
given tables, say:
categories
stories

If a category has_many :stories
then table stories should have a column named category_id

Generally, this association is followed with story belongs_to :category for a one to many relationship.
There are also one to one relationships using has_one and belongs_to

Active Record (and Rails in general from that) uses a very clever system of English pluralization for table names and associations rely on singular/plural rules.

Thanks! What do I do if I have:

has_many :platypi?

Just kidding,
Thanks,
Ari
--------------------------------------------|
If you're not living on the edge,
then you're just wasting space.

Ok. I have another Problem

Whenever I use my require statements:

  require 'rubygems'
  require 'active_record'

there is always a bunch of warnings spat out by activerecord.

HOWEVER, when I use:

  require 'rubygems'
  gem 'activerecord'

these warning do not show. Why is that?

And of late, when I use:

  require 'rubygems'
  gem 'activerecord'

I get a require error saying not that the gem 'activerecord' could not be found,
but that I have an unitiliazed constant 'ActiveRecord::Base'.

Bwah???

thanks,
aRi
-------------------------------------------|
Nietzsche is my copilot

BTW, here is the exact warnings spat by ActiveRecord:
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.15.3/lib/active_record/validations.rb:334: warning: `*' interpreted as argument prefix
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.15.3/lib/active_record/validations.rb:363: warning: `*' interpreted as argument prefix
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.15.3/lib/active_record/migration.rb:226: warning: instance variable @ignore_new_methods not initialized
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.15.3/lib/active_record/migration.rb:226: warning: instance variable @ignore_new_methods not initialized
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.15.3/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:7: warning: `*' interpreted as argument prefix
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.15.3/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_specification.rb:41: warning: method redefined; discarding old allow_concurrency=
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.15.3/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/postgresql_adapter.rb:390: warning: `&' interpreted as argument prefix

I'm using Ruby 1.8.6 on powerpc darwin (Mac OS X)

and the missing gem:
new:6: uninitialized constant ActiveRecord (NameError)

aRi
--------------------------------------------|
If you're not living on the edge,
then you're just wasting space.

Ok. I have another Problem

Whenever I use my require statements:

        require 'rubygems'
        require 'active_record'

there is always a bunch of warnings spat out by activerecord.

HOWEVER, when I use:

        require 'rubygems'
        gem 'activerecord'

these warning do not show. Why is that?

Because gem() doesn't require anything.

And of late, when I use:

        require 'rubygems'
        gem 'activerecord'

I get a require error saying not that the gem 'activerecord' could
not be found,
but that I have an unitiliazed constant 'ActiveRecord::Base'.

See above. :slight_smile:

···

On 8/1/07, Ari Brown <ari@aribrown.com> wrote:

Bwah? But I've used it before! How can this be?

---------------------------------------------------------------|
~Ari
"I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it" --1337est man alive

···

On Aug 1, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Gregory Brown wrote:

On 8/1/07, Ari Brown <ari@aribrown.com> wrote:

Ok. I have another Problem

Whenever I use my require statements:

        require 'rubygems'
        require 'active_record'

there is always a bunch of warnings spat out by activerecord.

HOWEVER, when I use:

        require 'rubygems'
        gem 'activerecord'

these warning do not show. Why is that?

Because gem() doesn't require anything.

This behaviour has been on the way out since before 0.9.0. Just use:

require "rubygems"
require "active_record"

gem() is meant to be used only to lock a gem to a specific version,
not to load a library.

As far as the warnings go, it's because the Rails core team is too
cool for ruby -w :-/

···

On 8/1/07, Ari Brown <ari@aribrown.com> wrote:

> Because gem() doesn't require anything.

Bwah? But I've used it before! How can this be?