Rene van Bevern rvb@rvb.dyndns.org wrote in message news:slrnbnr2pu.1qe.rvb@negoyl.vb-network…
I know at least one more person who came to LISP/Scheme over ruby. Maybe
it needs ruby and python to enlighten people without confusing them with
a syntax they are not used to first.
I can’t remember how exactly I came to use scheme (unfortuantely I
don’t keep a diary), but trying to reconstruct it looks something like
this:
I am actually not a programmer, but mostly a linguist. About four
years ago I got interested in computational linguistics and decided to
learn a programming language. The first programming book I picked up
was “The Gentle Introduction…” (Common Lisp). I made sense to me but
I couldn’t find a plug’n’ play lisp implementation (I was pretty
computer-illiterate at the time: could only manage v. basic stuff on
Windoze). So I put that aside and decided to have a go at Perl (widely
used in NLP). That was much easier, I installed the ActiveState win32
port no problems and picked Perl up from online tutorials and the
multitude of other easily accessible Perl resources. After I’ve played
with perl for a while I heard about Python and Ruby, which to me
looked like more sophisticated versions of Perl, and I switched to
Ruby for most of my toy and not-so-toy scripts. While reading
ruby-talk and other ruby-stuff I kept coming across references to
Scheme and Lisp, which I was already vaguely familiar with from my
perusal of the “Gentle Introduction”. At this point I was already
using Linux and so could easily install Clisp and half a dozen Scheme
implementations. Schemes such as Gauche, Bigloo and PLT seemed like
they were better suited to writing the sort of small programs or CGI
scripts that I was using Perl and Ruby for, so I sort of settled for
Scheme. (Sometime during this time I also learned Prolog in a
university course and it made me aware of the various advantages, as
well as some disadvantages, of using a very high level languages in
comp-ling).
At the moment I am quite happy with Scheme although I do miss the
large lively communities and the amout of libraries associated with
Perl, Python and Ruby. I hope the “revival” of Lisp-like languages
some of you have observed will gain momentum and that CL anb Scheme
will catch up with Python and Ruby in the areas where they are behind.
Cheers,
···
–
Grzegorz