Hi all,
I want a pure Ruby version of zlib 1.2.x. This will put an end to at
least one of the more annoying Windows compiler/stdlib issues. Anyone
up for it?
Also, I want a pure Ruby version of OpenSSH. And a pony.
Regards,
Dan
re SSH, are you looking for a ruby implementation of the command-line
utilities? Or some kind of library support added to standard protocols like
LDAP or FTP for tunnelling purposes?
···
On Dec 10, 2007 10:14 AM, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I want a pure Ruby version of zlib 1.2.x. This will put an end to at
least one of the more annoying Windows compiler/stdlib issues. Anyone
up for it?Also, I want a pure Ruby version of OpenSSH. And a pony.
I believe he actually meant OpenSSL.
James Edward Gray II
···
On Dec 10, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Francis Cianfrocca wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 10:14 AM, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I want a pure Ruby version of zlib 1.2.x. This will put an end to at
least one of the more annoying Windows compiler/stdlib issues. Anyone
up for it?Also, I want a pure Ruby version of OpenSSH. And a pony.
re SSH, are you looking for a ruby implementation of the command-line
utilities? Or some kind of library support added to standard protocols like
LDAP or FTP for tunnelling purposes?
Makes sense. Must have been the pony that threw me.
···
On Dec 10, 2007 10:27 AM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
I believe he actually meant OpenSSL.
Oops, yes, OpenSSL.
Regards,
Dan
···
On Dec 10, 8:27 am, James Gray <ja...@grayproductions.net> wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Francis Cianfrocca wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 10:14 AM, Daniel Berger <djber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I want a pure Ruby version of zlib 1.2.x. This will put an end to at
>> least one of the more annoying Windows compiler/stdlib issues. Anyone
>> up for it?>> Also, I want a pure Ruby version of OpenSSH. And a pony.
> re SSH, are you looking for a ruby implementation of the command-line
> utilities? Or some kind of library support added to standard
> protocols like
> LDAP or FTP for tunnelling purposes?I believe he actually meant OpenSSL.