Prettier documentation

ruby-talk
1

hi all,

how is the documentation for http://rake.rubyforge.org/ and
http://syntax.rubyforge.org/api/ generated?
i like the look of it much better than vanilla rdoc.

any ideas?

thanks,
_c

···

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

2

i finally found the answer to my question through quasi-random googling.
shame that nice templates like
Buckblog: RDoc Template are not included, by
default. maybe there should be a gem with additional rdoc templates or
something.

···

how is the documentation for http://rake.rubyforge.org/ and
http://syntax.rubyforge.org/api/ generated?
i like the look of it much better than vanilla rdoc.

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.

3

I don't undertand why the jamis template isn't included.

you might try allison though.

···

On Nov 19, 7:42 am, Christophe Mckeon <chromatoph...@gmail.com> wrote:

i finally found the answer to my question through quasi-random googling.
shame that nice templates likehttp://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2005/4/8/rdoc-templateare not included, by
default. maybe there should be a gem with additional rdoc templates or
something.

> how is the documentation forhttp://rake.rubyforge.org/and
>http://syntax.rubyforge.org/api/generated?
> i like the look of it much better than vanilla rdoc.

4

I don't undertand why the jamis template isn't included.

you might try allison though.

thanks, yeah, found that though my googling too. just blogged about it:

···

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.