Dear Nick,
I'm glad things finally worked out for you.
Actually, I things like '\352' do not to split any further (at least on my
system (cygwin 6.7.0.0-6) on Windows XP),
this seems to be some encoding for "ê" etc. that is Windows-specific.
In particular, it is not equivalent to a string composed of '\', '3','5','2'
(you would have to double the '\' in the regexp if you were searching
for a string '\352' in a text).
But the line
splitted_text=text.split(/(?=.)/)
should produce an Array with the individual letters in the string.
That involves a concept about regexps called zero-width positive
lookahead (see _http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html_
(http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html) ).
Please let us all know if you still encounter problems.
Best regards,
Axel
Zero width positive lookahead is a little overkill, split(//) works just as well, AFAIK
···
On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Nuralanur@aol.com wrote:
Dear Nick,
I'm glad things finally worked out for you.
Actually, I things like '\352' do not to split any further (at least on my
system (cygwin 6.7.0.0-6) on Windows XP),
this seems to be some encoding for "ê" etc. that is Windows-specific.
In particular, it is not equivalent to a string composed of '\', '3','5','2'
(you would have to double the '\' in the regexp if you were searching
for a string '\352' in a text).
But the line
splitted_text=text.split(/(?=.)/)
should produce an Array with the individual letters in the string.
That involves a concept about regexps called zero-width positive
lookahead (see _http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html_
(http://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html\) ).
Please let us all know if you still encounter problems.
Best regards,
Axel