Please tell me about ML (Re: Ruby/TkGnuplot release)

ruby-talk
1

> Yes, and also be sure to send the announcement to the new
> "ruby-tkgnuplot@rubynet.org" mailing list :wink:

Thank you for your advice.
But, I'm sorry, I don't know about the ML.
Could you teach me about it? Is it automatically created by
ruby-talk ML management system?

No, I apologize, this was just a bad joke. Over the last few days there
has been an ongoing discussion (on the ruby-talk ML) about splitting
that list up into a large number of special-purpose lists.

2

Yes, and also be sure to send the announcement to the new
“ruby-tkgnuplot@rubynet.org” mailing list :wink:

Thank you for your advice.
But, I’m sorry, I don’t know about the ML.
Could you teach me about it? Is it automatically created by
ruby-talk ML management system?

No, I apologize, this was just a bad joke. Over the last few days there
has been an ongoing discussion (on the ruby-talk ML) about splitting
that list up into a large number of special-purpose lists.

I’m sorry, I have to make a correction. It was in fact a good joke.

Gavin

¡¡¡

From: “Lyle Johnson” lyle@knology.net

3

“Lyle Johnson” lyle@knology.net wrote in message
news:000001c26b49$487f6b90$6401a8c0@oscarloo…

Yes, and also be sure to send the announcement to the new
“ruby-tkgnuplot@rubynet.org” mailing list :wink:

Thank you for your advice.
But, I’m sorry, I don’t know about the ML.
Could you teach me about it? Is it automatically created by
ruby-talk ML management system?

No, I apologize, this was just a bad joke. Over the last few days there
has been an ongoing discussion (on the ruby-talk ML) about splitting
that list up into a large number of special-purpose lists.

:-)) Now I understand. I was just getting gradually more depressed over the
issue - this is clearly a better approach.

Mikkel