consider the except from my comment:
“neverdbwisuggest”
···
-----Original Message-----
From: Gennady F. Bystritsky [mailto:gfb@tonesoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:29 PM
To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: [OT?] Pymacs in ruby?
Is it not?
----- Original Message -----
From: “Garriss, Michael” Michael.Garriss@abacus-direct.com
To: “ruby-talk ML” ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [OT?] Pymacs in ruby?
iI would neverbdwisuggest that vi was to best editor on this list.
-----Original Message-----
From: dblack@candle.superlink.net [mailto:dblack@candle.superlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:10 PM
To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: [OT?] Pymacs in ruby?Hi –
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Garriss, Michael wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Campbell [mailto:michael_s_campbell@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 11:41 AM
To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: [OT?] Pymacs in ruby?Well, I use emacs for more than just an editor. currently and in the
past,
it’s
been my multi-windowing “os”, ftp client, mail reader, news reader,
remote-file
editor, shell handler, IDE, etc.I like the idea of VIM for an editor based on the beauty of vi’s
paradigm,
but
it just can’t do what I use emacs for.That’s flame war talk…
It’s a testament to the baseline peace and harmony of this group that
a message alluding to the beauty of vi could be perceived as a shot in
a flame warDavid
–
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web: http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav