Howdy -
One nice thing about RubyForge is that you can see how many times your
project has been downloaded. But downloads via RubyGems don't get put
in the RubyForge database, so they don't show up in the charts. This is
sad.
However, you can now get an idea of how many Gem downloads your project
has had in the current month by going (for example) here:
http://gems.rubyforge.org/usage/usage_200504.html#TOPURLS
This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
Yours,
Tom
Huh. What are these "Rake" and "Rails" gems that are getting so many downloads?
P.S. That was a joke, people. Lighten up.
On 4/29/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
Nice, Tom!
Do you happen to capture user agent? I'd be _really_ interested in seeing that.
On 4/29/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
Howdy -
One nice thing about RubyForge is that you can see how many times your
project has been downloaded. But downloads via RubyGems don't get put
in the RubyForge database, so they don't show up in the charts. This is
sad.However, you can now get an idea of how many Gem downloads your project
has had in the current month by going (for example) here:RubyGems.org | your community gem host
This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
--
Chad Fowler
http://chadfowler.com
http://rubygems.rubyforge.org (over 300,000 gems served!)
Lyle Johnson wrote:
On 4/29/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
Huh. What are these "Rake" and "Rails" gems that are getting so many downloads?
P.S. That was a joke, people. Lighten up.
Clearly *someone* setup an automatic program to pump their own download stats. But, I won't mention any names.
KIDDING!
Dan
Lyle Johnson wrote:
Huh. What are these "Rake" and "Rails" gems that are getting so many downloads?
You've got a lot of nerve, Lyle. This is EXACTLY the kind of trolling that gets you killfiled today. *plonk*
P.S. That was a joke, people. Lighten up.
Oh, whoops. Hehe. Cool joke, bud!!
_why
Hm, you know, I'm not capturing that in the HTTP logs now... but GForge
keeps a sort of rolling activity log for the past week or so:
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 05:56 +0900, Chad Fowler wrote:
> RubyGems.org | your community gem host
>
> This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
>
Nice, Tom!Do you happen to capture user agent? I'd be _really_ interested in seeing that.
====================================
gforge=> select browser, count(*) from activity_log group by browser;
browser | count
---------+--------
OPERA | 233
MOZILLA | 257478
OTHER | 168405
IE | 77051
(4 rows)
Where Mozilla == (Firefox|moz|etc), I bet.
Yours,
Tom
Daniel Berger said:
Clearly *someone* setup an automatic program to pump their own download
stats. But, I won't mention any names.
I confess. My autodownload program is called Rails. Every time someone
installs Rails, it also downloads a copy of Rake.
--
-- Jim Weirich jim@weirichhouse.org http://onestepback.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)
What I was hoping for is stats on gems.rubyforge.org. We report user
agent when people do a remote install, so we could see who's using
what versions.
Thanks!
On 4/29/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 05:56 +0900, Chad Fowler wrote:
> > RubyGems.org | your community gem host
> >
> > This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
> >
> Nice, Tom!
>
> Do you happen to capture user agent? I'd be _really_ interested in seeing that.Hm, you know, I'm not capturing that in the HTTP logs now... but GForge
keeps a sort of rolling activity log for the past week or so:====================================
gforge=> select browser, count(*) from activity_log group by browser;
browser | count
---------+--------
OPERA | 233
MOZILLA | 257478
OTHER | 168405
IE | 77051
(4 rows)gforge=>
Where Mozilla == (Firefox|moz|etc), I bet.
--
Chad Fowler
http://chadfowler.com
http://rubygems.rubyforge.org (over 300,000 gems served!)
Ah, nope, we don't capture that yet in the HTTP logs. Hm. I wonder if
anything bad would happened if I added that to the log output spec
thingy. Would it break all the previous Webalizer graphs and whatnot...
Yours,
Tom
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 09:56 +0900, Chad Fowler wrote:
What I was hoping for is stats on gems.rubyforge.org. We report user
agent when people do a remote install, so we could see who's using
what versions.