ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i686-linux]
"5".to_i+ "6".to_i
=> 11
"5".to_i +"6".to_i
=> 5
maybe it's a mistak?
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i686-linux]
"5".to_i+ "6".to_i
=> 11
"5".to_i +"6".to_i
=> 5
maybe it's a mistak?
>> "5".to_i+ "6".to_i
=> 11
>> "5".to_i +"6".to_i
=> 5
The second case +"6".to_i is treated as an argument for to_i method.
This will make it more obvious:
"111".to_i +"2".to_i
=> 7
"111".to_i +"2".to_i is equivalent to "111".to_i(2), hence the result.
Regards,
Rimantas
"cap" <capitain@gmail.com> writes:
ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i686-linux]
"5".to_i+ "6".to_i
=> 11
so, you're calling "5".to_i.+("6".to_i), ie. "5".to_i.+(6),
ie. 5.+(6), ie. 11
"5".to_i +"6".to_i
you're calling "5".to_i(+"6".to_i), ie. "5".to_i(6),
ie. "5" converted in base 6, ie 5
Rule of thumb : always put spaces around operators...
--
Eric Jacoboni <eric.jacoboni@free.fr> writes:
you're calling "5".to_i(+"6".to_i), ie. "5".to_i(6),
ie. "5" converted in base 6, ie 5
Ooops... i wanted to say "5" in base 6, converted to int...
--
"cap" <capit...@gmail.com> writes:
> ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25 patchlevel 12) [i686-linux]
Thanks very much!
I got it
On Feb 4, 10:12 pm, Eric Jacoboni <eric.jacob...@free.fr> wrote:
>>> "5".to_i+ "6".to_i
> => 11so, you're calling "5".to_i.+("6".to_i), ie. "5".to_i.+(6),
ie. 5.+(6), ie. 11>>> "5".to_i +"6".to_i
you're calling "5".to_i(+"6".to_i), ie. "5".to_i(6),
ie. "5" converted in base 6, ie 5Rule of thumb : always put spaces around operators...
--