I hope that run index.rb in apache like php index.php without rails
I think rails is great,but i do not like rails
php's page next page is normal,such as html in web
but rails's url rule is not good
....
ok,how to run ruby like php?
i know about eruby,erb...and erubies. Erubies may be is my need,but i do
not know how to install for apache.
...
I hope run index.rb like php's index.php without rails!
thanks!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Any reason you don't like Rails? I see 'rails's url rule is not good', what
does that mean?
Jason
On 11/6/06, Haoqi Haoqi <axgle@126.com> wrote:
I hope that run index.rb in apache like php index.php without rails
I think rails is great,but i do not like rails
php's page next page is normal,such as html in web
but rails's url rule is not good
....
ok,how to run ruby like php?i know about eruby,erb...and erubies. Erubies may be is my need,but i do
not know how to install for apache.
...I hope run index.rb like php's index.php without rails!
thanks!--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
I assume he wants the file extensions on the end, so that when he
changes tools down the road, all his URLs will be broken. 
This link may help, though:
http://cyll.org/blog/tech/2006-08-26-makingrubyintophp.html
On 11/6/06, Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@gmail.com> wrote:
Any reason you don't like Rails? I see 'rails's url rule is not good', what
does that mean?Jason
On 11/6/06, Haoqi Haoqi <axgle@126.com> wrote:
>
> I hope that run index.rb in apache like php index.php without rails
> I think rails is great,but i do not like rails
> php's page next page is normal,such as html in web
> but rails's url rule is not good
> ....
> ok,how to run ruby like php?
>
> i know about eruby,erb...and erubies. Erubies may be is my need,but i do
> not know how to install for apache.
> ...
>
> I hope run index.rb like php's index.php without rails!
> thanks!
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
>
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
I assume he wants the file extensions on the end, so that when he
changes tools down the road, all his URLs will be broken.This link may help, though:
http://cyll.org/blog/tech/2006-08-26-makingrubyintophp.html
I could've sworn mod_ruby had an Erb handler of some sort to handle
pages like .rhtml even without that hideous hack.
And if it doesn't, well, *cough* -hint- 
David Vallner
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
I assume he wants the file extensions on the end, so that when he
changes tools down the road, all his URLs will be broken.
Also, on that note: http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI\.
The fact that newly developed PHP / JSP / other CGI still happily
violates rules that were published in an eight year old document (and
were a bad idea ages before anyway) makes me cringe. The fact
half-decent support for clean URLs is only a recend development in web
frameworks makes me cringe more... (Ugh, mod_rewrite)
David Vallner