Basic aim of mruby is similar to Lua. The biggest differences are:
* some prefer Ruby to Lua
* mruby comes with standard compiled libraries written in Ruby
* mruby has API that does not need to tweek VM stack directly
* Lua is smaller, and LuaJIT is faster
matz.
···
In message "Re: mruby vs. lua" on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:50:36 +0100, Marc Heiler <lists@ruby-forum.com> writes:
Hi,
How will mruby compare to lua?
I could use mruby similar to lua, is that one of the main ideas behind
mruby?
And I assume that folks who know C will significantly profit from mruby
more so than "normal" ruby users who know only ruby?