I'm creating a meta script that can generate both a shell script and a
Makefile. I want the script to be human readable, so I don't want to
substitute all the variables, so $(top_srcdir) =
"/my/obsenely/huge/directory/name" doesn't get substituted in for
example $(srcdir) = $(top_srcdir)/foo.
The problem is that bash doesn't use the same syntax for variable substitution.
I guess the easiest thing to do is just s/$()/${}/ but I was wondering
if there's a better way to do that.
Since I know Rubyists can always find better ways to write code I
decided to ask here.
Is there a better way to implement meta variable substitution?
Are you parsing the files? I had the impression that you are
generating them. In that case I would just generate the variable names
rather late and somehow factorize
the code into
def var_name name
"${#{name}}"
end
def var_name name
"$(#{name})"
end
if this polymorphic approach is not suitable for your design an if
statement shall do.
HTH
Robert
···
On 10/10/07, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm creating a meta script that can generate both a shell script and a
Makefile. I want the script to be human readable, so I don't want to
substitute all the variables, so $(top_srcdir) =
"/my/obsenely/huge/directory/name" doesn't get substituted in for
example $(srcdir) = $(top_srcdir)/foo.
The problem is that bash doesn't use the same syntax for variable substitution.
I guess the easiest thing to do is just s/$()/${}/ but I was wondering
if there's a better way to do that.
Since I know Rubyists can always find better ways to write code I
decided to ask here.
Is there a better way to implement meta variable substitution?
> Hi,
>
> I'm creating a meta script that can generate both a shell script and a
> Makefile. I want the script to be human readable, so I don't want to
> substitute all the variables, so $(top_srcdir) =
> "/my/obsenely/huge/directory/name" doesn't get substituted in for
> example $(srcdir) = $(top_srcdir)/foo.
>
> The problem is that bash doesn't use the same syntax for variable substitution.
>
> I guess the easiest thing to do is just s/$()/${}/ but I was wondering
> if there's a better way to do that.
>
> Since I know Rubyists can always find better ways to write code I
> decided to ask here.
>
> Is there a better way to implement meta variable substitution?
>
Are you parsing the files? I had the impression that you are
generating them. In that case I would just generate the variable names
rather late and somehow factorize
the code into
Yeah, I'm generating them.
def var_name name
"${#{name}}"
end
def var_name name
"$(#{name})"
end
if this polymorphic approach is not suitable for your design an if
statement shall do.
A polymorphic approach is fine, but I want this in my code:
foo="<var_start>var_name<var_end>/bar"
So you are suggesting something like:
foo="#{pseudo_var_name}/bar"
Right?
···
On 10/10/07, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/10/07, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote: