Yup I meant rails...sorry about that.
On 7/11/05, Douglas Livingstone <rampant@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/11/05, Dennis Roberts <denrober@gmail.com> wrote:
> Want to support Ruby? Use Textdrive (http://www.textdrive.com/\).
> When you sign up a portion of your payment goes to the open source
> project of your choice and Ruby is one of the choices. They are also
> very cheap, stable, and DHH is associated with them.
>Don't you mean Rails, not Ruby?
Douglas
...
Thanks, I am aware of them and have contributed to several.
This link might provide you a better summary:
http://www.phpwact.org/php/mvc_frameworks
But this is starting to go significantly off topic for a Ruby mailing list.
Regards,
Jason
http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
On 7/6/05, Greg Donald <destiney@gmail.com> wrote:
There are already quite a few MVC frameworks for PHP:
mathew wrote:
Jason Sweat wrote:
On one forum I watch, there was discussion of doing a Rails port to
PHP.I could really use a Java version of Rails; I've been referring to this hypothetical project as "Java on Crutches".
mathew
I believe someone already started one:
http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2005/06/23/trails.html
Yan
> And where is your problem ?
I'm not sure if English is your first language or not, but in the
English vernacular, "[What] is your problem?" is a fairly
argumentative phrase.
Actually, it's just a question. How you choose to interpret that
question is another matter.
Wayne
i should add that i'm still using them and generally happy. i just don't like
anyone being able to drop the webserver at any time... dunno a good
alternative either.
fyi.
-a
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Carl Youngblood wrote:
I agree. At one point I was considering TextDrive because of all the good
things other railsers were saying about them, but the cost/benefit simply
wasn't worth it to me. After hearing your experience the decision becomes
that much easier.
email :: ara [dot] t [dot] howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
phone :: 303.497.6469
My religion is very simple. My religion is kindness.
--Tenzin Gyatso
===============================================================================
That was unnecessary. Please don't be so rude in an otherwise friendly community.
Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@gmail.com> wrote:
And where is your problem ?
I'm not sure if English is your first language or not, but in the
English vernacular, "[What] is your problem?" is a fairly
argumentative phrase.
Yan-Fa Li ha scritto:
mathew wrote:
Jason Sweat wrote:
On one forum I watch, there was discussion of doing a Rails port to
PHP.I could really use a Java version of Rails; I've been referring to this hypothetical project as "Java on Crutches".
mathew
I believe someone already started one:
well this is also true for the php one:
http://sputnik.pl/cake/
I too use and like them. They open up pretty much everything I want by default, so it's easy to set up whatever I need. My favorite feature though is their support, which is the best I've ever seen.
James Edward Gray II
On Jul 11, 2005, at 3:36 PM, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Carl Youngblood wrote:
I agree. At one point I was considering TextDrive because of all the good
things other railsers were saying about them, but the cost/benefit simply
wasn't worth it to me. After hearing your experience the decision becomes
that much easier.i should add that i'm still using them and generally happy.
What about not giving people rights to HUP the webserver and just allowing
them to terminate their own FCGI processes? Either that, or allowing them to
run their own instance of lighttpd.
Carl
On 7/11/05, Ara.T.Howard <Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Carl Youngblood wrote:
> I agree. At one point I was considering TextDrive because of all the
good
> things other railsers were saying about them, but the cost/benefit
simply
> wasn't worth it to me. After hearing your experience the decision
becomes
> that much easier.i should add that i'm still using them and generally happy. i just don't
like
anyone being able to drop the webserver at any time... dunno a good
alternative either.
>>And where is your problem ?
>
>
> I'm not sure if English is your first language or not, but in the
> English vernacular, "[What] is your problem?" is a fairly
> argumentative phrase.That was unnecessary.
So was that.
Please don't be so rude in an otherwise friendly
community.
I tried responding offlist (which you should have done), but since you
don't have a valid reply-to, I couldn't.
I wasn't being rude. I asked a simple question. He responded with
what, in HIS view I'm sure, was a perfectly non-instrusive response,
which would be widely construed (even by many overly pedantic types, 1
of which replied here) as an argumentative phrase. I was only
informing him of that fact so in the future he would know. Most
bi-lingual speakers I've I know like to know the idioms and vernacular
of their non-native tongue.
Reply to this if you like, I'm killfiling the thread (locally) so I
won't see it any longer; it's long since outlived its usefulness, and
I doubt my intentions can be adequately expressed over this medium.
Cheers
On 7/13/05, Ferdinand <Fe_Como@yahoo.com> wrote:
Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@gmail.com> wrote:
TextDrive certainly does the latter. I'm running two instances of lighttpd and and instance of Instiki (WEBrick), in addition to the standard Apache stuff.
They walked me through the lighttpd setup process to get it running exactly like I wanted. Did I mention they have killer support?
James Edward Gray II
On Jul 11, 2005, at 4:57 PM, Carl Youngblood wrote:
What about not giving people rights to HUP the webserver and just allowing
them to terminate their own FCGI processes? Either that, or allowing them to
run their own instance of lighttpd.
I agree. At one point I was considering TextDrive because of all the
good
things other railsers were saying about them, but the cost/benefit
simply
wasn't worth it to me. After hearing your experience the decision
becomes
that much easier.
i should add that i'm still using them and generally happy. i just don't
like
anyone being able to drop the webserver at any time... dunno a good
alternative either.What about not giving people rights to HUP the webserver and just allowing
them to terminate their own FCGI processes?
tough to configure virtual hosts that way 
that'd be a good idea for
fastcgi though. then there mod_ruby, etc - which requires a restart... i
think some sort of virtual machine is required - dunno what you call it -
where each user gets root on his own os and you have your very own apache
instance might be the only way... in some respects shared hosting and
fastcgi/mod_xxx simply don't belong together - it's a tough thing to do well i
realize.
Either that, or allowing them to run their own instance of lighttpd.
they do that - but i'm personally not that keen on lighttpd.
regards.
-a
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Carl Youngblood wrote:
On 7/11/05, Ara.T.Howard <Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Carl Youngblood wrote:
email :: ara [dot] t [dot] howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
phone :: 303.497.6469
My religion is very simple. My religion is kindness.
--Tenzin Gyatso
===============================================================================