Are there any methods which work exactly like []= but return the changed
array, different from []= which returns void?
Sun Park wrote:
Are there any methods which work exactly like = but return the changed
array, different from = which returns void?
Array#fill?
a = [0, 1, 2, 3]
=> [0, 1, 2, 3]
irb(main):006:0> a.fill("x", 2..2)
=> [0, 1, "x", 3]
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
Thanks do we have such method in String class, too?
···
2007/6/3, Daniel Lucraft <dan@fluentradical.com>:
Sun Park wrote:
> Are there any methods which work exactly like = but return the changed
> array, different from = which returns void?Array#fill?
a = [0, 1, 2, 3]
=> [0, 1, 2, 3]irb(main):006:0> a.fill("x", 2..2)
=> [0, 1, "x", 3]--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
irb(main):008:0> a='abc'
=> "abc"
irb(main):009:0> a[1]=?a
=> 97
irb(main):013:0> a[1..1]="a"
=> "a"
thus String#= is behaving differently from Array#=
Cheers
Robert
You see things; and you say Why?
But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
-- George Bernard Shaw
···
On 6/3/07, Sun Park <geniusleonid@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks do we have such method in String class, too?
Sorry, what I meant was :
a = "abc"
=> "abc"
a (some method with arguments of 1 and "d")
=> "adc"
I wanted to find out are there any methods behaving like this.
···
2007/6/3, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com>:
On 6/3/07, Sun Park <geniusleonid@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks do we have such method in String class, too?
irb(main):008:0> a='abc'
=> "abc"
irb(main):009:0> a[1]=?a
=> 97
irb(main):013:0> a[1..1]="a"
=> "a"thus String#= is behaving differently from Array#=
Cheers
Robert
You see things; and you say Why?
But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
-- George Bernard Shaw
Sun Park wrote:
Sorry, what I meant was :
a = "abc"
=> "abc"
a (some method with arguments of 1 and "d")
=> "adc"I wanted to find out are there any methods behaving like this.
a = "abc"
a[1,1] = "d"
a # => "adc"
a[1] = ?b
a # => "abc"
Enjoy
Stefan
Sorry, what I meant was :
a = "abc"
=> "abc"
a (some method with arguments of 1 and "d")
=> "adc"I wanted to find out are there any methods behaving like this.
Yes #=, what is wrong with it? Would you prefer a method with a
different name, I am not sure there is one.
Robert
···
On 6/3/07, Sun Park <geniusleonid@gmail.com> wrote:
2007/6/3, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com>:
>
> On 6/3/07, Sun Park <geniusleonid@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks do we have such method in String class, too?
> irb(main):008:0> a='abc'
> => "abc"
> irb(main):009:0> a[1]=?a
> => 97
> irb(main):013:0> a[1..1]="a"
> => "a"
>
> thus String#= is behaving differently from Array#=
>
> Cheers
> Robert
> You see things; and you say Why?
> But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
> -- George Bernard Shaw
>
--
You see things; and you say Why?
But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
-- George Bernard Shaw
None directly that I know of, but ...
a = "abc
a.split('').fill("d",1,1).join
or
(a[1]='d';a)
···
On 6/3/07, Sun Park <geniusleonid@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, what I meant was :
a = "abc"
=> "abc"
a (some method with arguments of 1 and "d")
=> "adc"I wanted to find out are there any methods behaving like this.
Sun Park wrote:
> Sorry, what I meant was :
>
> a = "abc"
> => "abc"
> a (some method with arguments of 1 and "d")
> => "adc"
>
> I wanted to find out are there any methods behaving like this.
>
This was not my post!!
Robert
···
On 6/3/07, Stefan Rusterholz <apeiros@gmx.net> wrote:
> 2007/6/3, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com>:
Enjoy
Stefan--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
--
You see things; and you say Why?
But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
-- George Bernard Shaw
a = "abc"
p a[1] = "d" # I think the OP wants to see "adc" here
p a # not just here
Harry
···
On 6/3/07, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/3/07, Sun Park <geniusleonid@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, what I meant was :
>
> a = "abc"
> => "abc"
> a (some method with arguments of 1 and "d")
> => "adc"
>
> I wanted to find out are there any methods behaving like this.
Yes #=, what is wrong with it? Would you prefer a method with a
different name, I am not sure there is one.
Robert
>
--
A Look into Japanese Ruby List in English