Fowler points to some folks replacing Ant with Rake:
http://martinfowler.com/bliki/JRake.html
Regards,
···
--
Bil Kleb
http://kleb.tadalist.com/lists/public/427170
Fowler points to some folks replacing Ant with Rake:
JRake
Regards,
--
Bil Kleb
Ruby Wish List
awesome, that will fit nicely with my current toolset
thanks Bil
Bil Kleb wrote:
Fowler points to some folks replacing Ant with Rake:
Yeah, cool stuff. I've been following the JRake development the past week or so and it's starting to look pretty solid. I've figured this would be a great application of JRuby, and I'm glad someone with more time than me decided to start wiring it up 
I had originally planned to make it use Ant tasks, but perhaps there's more value in reimplementing the tasks from scratch to be more Rubyish? My justification was in reusing all the many, many Ant tasks already implemented within a Rake script, but I can see both sides.
···
--
Charles Oliver Nutter, JRuby Core Developer
Blogging on Ruby and Java @ headius.blogspot.com
Help spec out Ruby today! @ Welcome to headius.com
headius@headius.com -- charles.nutter@sun.com
I had originally planned to make it use Ant tasks, but perhaps there's
more value in reimplementing the tasks from scratch to be more Rubyish?
My justification was in reusing all the many, many Ant tasks already
implemented within a Rake script, but I can see both sides.
From what you've seen about JRake so far, would it be too
difficult to generate Rakefiles out of Ant build.xml makefiles ?
best,
UG
···
---
Uma Geller
Uma Geller wrote:
From what you've seen about JRake so far, would it be too
difficult to generate Rakefiles out of Ant build.xml makefiles ?
It's hard to say, but if there's a straightfoward translation for tasks, it shouldn't be hard to make that translation. Ant is almost exclusively descriptive rather than procedural, so going to a more procedural build script like JRake/Rake ought not to be too difficult.
···
--
Charles Oliver Nutter, JRuby Core Developer
Blogging on Ruby and Java @ headius.blogspot.com
Help spec out Ruby today! @ Welcome to headius.com
headius@headius.com -- charles.nutter@sun.com
> I had originally planned to make it use Ant tasks, but perhaps there's
> more value in reimplementing the tasks from scratch to be more Rubyish?
> My justification was in reusing all the many, many Ant tasks already
> implemented within a Rake script, but I can see both sides.
>From what you've seen about JRake so far, would it be too
difficult to generate Rakefiles out of Ant build.xml makefiles ?best,
I know I'm posting to this forum a little late but....
In my opinion, the best approach is to invoke Ant tasks from within a
rake file. The best part of Ant is the multitude of tasks available. I
wrote awrapper called Antwrap which may be helpful to you:
http://rubyforge.org/projects/antwrap/
http://antwrap.rubyforge.org/
There is a convert.rb script available which will convert an Ant
build.xml file to a Rake file. Antwrap is a gem that allows you to
invoke Ant tasks from within a Ruby/JRuby script.
Cheers,
Caleb