Hi –
···
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, Sam Roberts wrote:
Quoteing rpav@nwlink.com, on Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 07:26:01AM +0900:
OK, looking at the archives I know this was discussed a few years ago,
but there seems to be no real conclusion or improvement since then.The problem: Hash#each_with_index returns an index that is not usable
to address the hash. That is, given the following:h = Hash.new h.each_with_index { > o, i | ... }
i is not defined such that h[i] == o, which is both misleading and
seemingly useless. (This behavior, as per the previous discussion, can
be achieved with h.to_a.each_with_index.)This function already exists, for a Hash its called Hash#each.
Not exactly: Hash#each returns [k,v] pairs, not [v,k] pairs. The
[element,index] style of Array#each_with_index is more similar to
the latter than the former (i.e., array[index] == element, and
hash[k] = v).
David
–
David Alan Black
home: dblack@superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web: http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav