Daniel,
Should we release a new Watir gem installer that requires these updated
files?
Bret
···
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Daniel Waite <rabbitblue@gmail.com> wrote:
Daniel Berger wrote:
> Yep, you want this combination:
>
> win32-api 1.3.0 or later
> windows-api 0.3.0 or later
> windows-pr 0.9.9 or later
Duly noted. Installing Watir installed all those things (plus a few
other gems). However, I have two versions of windows-pr: 0.9.3 and
0.9.9. My guess is that Watir installed 0.9.3. Thanks for the summary.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
--
Bret Pettichord
GTalk: bpettichord@gmail.com
CTO, WatirCraft LLC, http://www.watircraft.com
Lead Developer, Watir, http://wtr.rubyforge.org
Blog (Essays), http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog
MiniBlog (Links), Bret's Recommendations
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
Daniel,
Should we release a new Watir gem installer that requires these updated
files?
Wouldn't hurt I suppose. It would probably be less confusing.
Sorry for the trouble.
Regards,
Dan
···
On Feb 5, 6:38 pm, Bret Pettichord <bpettich...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Daniel Waite <rabbitb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Daniel Berger wrote:
> > Yep, you want this combination:
> > win32-api 1.3.0 or later
> > windows-api 0.3.0 or later
> > windows-pr 0.9.9 or later
> Duly noted. Installing Watir installed all those things (plus a few
> other gems). However, I have two versions of windows-pr: 0.9.3 and
> 0.9.9. My guess is that Watir installed 0.9.3. Thanks for the summary.
>
> --
> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
Bret Pettichord
GTalk: bpettich...@gmail.com
CTO, WatirCraft LLC,http://www.watircraft.com
Lead Developer, Watir,http://wtr.rubyforge.org
Blog (Essays),http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog
MiniBlog (Links),Bret's Recommendations
Daniel,
I updated the gemspec for Watir and distributed a new gem (privately) but it
did not fix this problem. My understanding is that bad gems were released
and then new gems were released with the same version numbers. Is this true?
If it is, then the only reliable solution would be for you to re-release the
fixed gems with an incremented version number. This is the only way that the
gem system will be sure to update people who have the bad gems.
We are getting more and more complaints about this, and the current solution
is very complicated to explain to people, so I would appreciate your help in
finding a simple solution.
I'm not sure I really understand the situation. If not, I would appreciate
clarification.
Bret
···
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:38 pm, Bret Pettichord <bpettich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
>
> Daniel,
>
> Should we release a new Watir gem installer that requires these updated
> files?
Wouldn't hurt I suppose. It would probably be less confusing.
Sorry for the trouble.
Regards,
Dan
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Daniel Waite <rabbitb...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > Daniel Berger wrote:
> > > Yep, you want this combination:
>
> > > win32-api 1.3.0 or later
> > > windows-api 0.3.0 or later
> > > windows-pr 0.9.9 or later
>
> > Duly noted. Installing Watir installed all those things (plus a few
> > other gems). However, I have two versions of windows-pr: 0.9.3 and
> > 0.9.9. My guess is that Watir installed 0.9.3. Thanks for the summary.
> >
> > --
> > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
> --
> Bret Pettichord
> GTalk: bpettich...@gmail.com
> CTO, WatirCraft LLC,http://www.watircraft.com
> Lead Developer, Watir,http://wtr.rubyforge.org
> Blog (Essays),http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog<http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog>
> MiniBlog (Links),Bret's Recommendations
--
Bret Pettichord
GTalk: bpettichord@gmail.com
CTO, WatirCraft LLC, http://www.watircraft.com
Lead Developer, Watir, http://www.watir.com
Blog (Essays), http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog
MiniBlog (Links), Bret's Recommendations
Training, http://www.watircraft.com/watir-training