Fastcgi + lighttpd?

Hello,

How I can use fastcgi with lighttpd for ruby script ?
I have try many configure, and I have always this error :
2005-05-09 23:31:54: (fcgi.c.770) child exited (is this a FastCGI binary ?): 1

So ? How I can configure ?

Thanks,

oxman

What sort of script is it? Is it using FastCGI protocol?

···

On 5/9/05, oxman <no@spam.org> wrote:

Hello,

How I can use fastcgi with lighttpd for ruby script ?
I have try many configure, and I have always this error :
2005-05-09 23:31:54: (fcgi.c.770) child exited (is this a FastCGI binary
?): 1

So ? How I can configure ?

Aredridel wrote:

···

On 5/9/05, oxman <no@spam.org> wrote:

Hello,

How I can use fastcgi with lighttpd for ruby script ?
I have try many configure, and I have always this error :
2005-05-09 23:31:54: (fcgi.c.770) child exited (is this a FastCGI binary
?): 1

So ? How I can configure ?

What sort of script is it? Is it using FastCGI protocol?

Hum ?
I want FastCGI work like PHP.

For example :

- test.fcgi -
<p>Hello <%= "oxman" %></p>

If your answer here is yes, do scripts in other languages work?

See these for help:
http://www.lighttpd.net/documentation/fastcgi.html

E

···

Le 9/5/2005, "Aredridel" <aredridel@gmail.com> a écrit:

On 5/9/05, oxman <no@spam.org> wrote:

Hello,

How I can use fastcgi with lighttpd for ruby script ?
I have try many configure, and I have always this error :
2005-05-09 23:31:54: (fcgi.c.770) child exited (is this a FastCGI binary
?): 1

So ? How I can configure ?

What sort of script is it? Is it using FastCGI protocol?

--
template<typename duck>
void quack(duck& d) { d.quack(); }

Hi,

I want FastCGI work like PHP.

For example :

- test.fcgi -
<p>Hello <%= "oxman" %></p>

Well, that looks like 'mod_ruby' or ERB - and that's not something
special to fcgi. With fcgi you can speed up your web application, as
that takes care of handling your connections withoud the need to start a
new ruby instance with every request. So it's usually a replacement for
the built-in CGI class.

Regards,

Dominik.

···

oxman <no@spam.org> wrote: