Is there an obvious method for a module like
that would result in A::B?
Module.nesting came to mind, but no I didn't see an obvious way to make it work.
Daniel Brumbaugh Keeney
···
A:
:C
What do you mean?
You know, modules are objects, constants are stored in modules. Given those rules you can put a module almost anywhere. AFAICT what you cannot change via API is its name, which is set in stone the first time a module is assigned to a constant. That happens in regular module definitions, or explicitly like this:
$ irb
irb(main):001:0> m = Module.new
=> #<Module:0x20eb6c>
irb(main):002:0> m.name
=> ""
irb(main):003:0> M = m
=> M
irb(main):004:0> m.name
=> "M"
irb(main):005:0> N = M
=> M
irb(main):006:0> N.name
=> "M"
-- fxn
···
On Jan 19, 2008, at 12:29 AM, Daniel Brumbaugh Keeney wrote:
Is there an obvious method for a module like
A::C
that would result in A::B?
Oh, perhaps you just want something like Module#parent provided by Active Support. There the parent is computed by hand from the module name:
def parent
parent_name = name.split('::')[0..-2] * '::'
parent_name.empty? ? Object : parent_name.constantize
end
where String#constantize is
def constantize(camel_cased_word)
unless /\A(?:::)?([A-Z]\w*(?:::[A-Z]\w*)*)\z/ =~ camel_cased_word
raise NameError, "#{camel_cased_word.inspect} is not a valid constant name!"
end
Object.module_eval("::#{$1}", __FILE__, __LINE__)
end
-- fxn
···
On Jan 19, 2008, at 1:07 AM, Xavier Noria wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 12:29 AM, Daniel Brumbaugh Keeney wrote:
Is there an obvious method for a module like
A:
that would result in A::B?What do you mean?