That's a good question, and I don't remember enough of the initial context
to give an answer. I would guess I'd probably start with asking for
clarification as to whether the OP was working through an existing tutorial
or trying to create a new tutorial.
-s
···
On 2010-02-11, Marnen Laibow-Koser <marnen@marnen.org> wrote:
Seebs wrote:
On 2010-02-11, Marnen Laibow-Koser <marnen@marnen.org> wrote:
"Shock tactics" was a poor choice of words on my part. I suppose I
should have said "putting things in a way that is less easy to ignore."
It came across as more confrontational, but that is in practice easier
to ignore than you might think. It's hard to not notice that there was
a message, but it's easier to overlook the message.
OK, how would you have put it?
--
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam@seebs.net
| Seebs.Net <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
Fair game (Scientology) - Wikipedia <-- get educated!