Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Maybe one day Ruby becomes Efficient, Straightforward and Constistend.
And most important: _really_ fully OO based.
I didn't even realize Ruby was OO. Ruby is a fun procedural language. I gotta admit though, that those class thingies are somewhat useful as syntactic sugar. What you may be really looking for is some sort of language designer who can also be a father figure to you. I could be that. I'd be willing to adopt you. There'll be lots of rules though. Follow me, close your eyes, click your heels together and pull my finger. We'll create a new language together.
FART (Fictive is not Another Ruby Tongue)
···
--
J. Lambert
Please let this thread just end.
Jon A. Lambert wrote:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Maybe one day Ruby becomes Efficient, Straightforward and Constistend.
And most important: _really_ fully OO based.
I didn't even realize Ruby was OO. Ruby is a fun procedural language. I gotta admit though, that those class thingies are somewhat useful as syntactic sugar.
The Creator of Ruby
Yukihiro Matsumoto,
writes
"
# Ruby is a complete, full, pure object oriented language: OOL. This means all data in Ruby is an object, in the sense of Smalltalk: no exceptions. Example: In Ruby, the number 1 is an instance of class Fixnum.
# Ruby's OO is carefully designed to be both complete and open for improvements. Example: Ruby has the ability to add methods to a class, or even to an instance during runtime. So, if needed, an instance of one class *can* behave differently from other instances of the same class.
"
source: http://ruby-lang.org/en/20020101.html
···
-
so, Species "simulated stupidity", please do not spread missleading information, just to have a nice intro for your "FART":
What you may be really looking for is some sort of language designer who can also be a father figure to you. I could be that. I'd be willing to adopt you. There'll be lots of rules though. Follow me, close your eyes, click your heels together and pull my finger. We'll create a new language together.
FART (Fictive is not Another Ruby Tongue)
--
J. Lambert
..
--
http://lazaridis.com
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Please let this thread just end.
Mr. "ilias.lazaridis@gmail.com".
I am wondering if this is your only "gmail" acount.
Cause ann abuse comlain will terminate all of them.
Prepare.
..
···
--
http://lazaridis.com
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
# Ruby is a complete, full, pure object oriented language: OOL. This
Not relevant to procedural language evaluation
..
Please remain on-topic, so I can remain on budget!
$cat test.rb
def f(i);x=5;p i;p x;end;(1..10).each do|x|f(x);break if x > 6;end
$ruby proctest.rb test.rb
running procedural test sequence...
...sequence tests [passed]
...alternation tests [passed]
...loop tests [passed]
...subprogram tests [passed]
...variable scope tests [passed]
...fun quotient tests [passed]
EVALUATION COMPLETE: Ruby is fun procedural language!
ERROR: Lazaridis object provided false analysis.
DIAGNOSIS: Lazaridis object defective.
ACTION: Cannot adopt Lazaridis object.
FART analysis now overbudget... (_o_)...pulling plug.
Make your time now
···
--
J Lambert
Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> writes:
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Please let this thread just end.
Mr. "ilias.lazaridis@gmail.com".
I am wondering if this is your only "gmail" acount.
Cause ann abuse comlain will terminate all of them.
Prepare.
..
--
http://lazaridis.com
irb(main):001:0> Ilias.dup
TypeError: can't dup Ilias
from (irb):1:in `dup'
from (irb):1
# puh
This was *definitively* my last post on this "issue",
···
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org