ERB or Haml?
Vote here: http://t.co/5ju0pssY
Slim!
···
On Oct 4, 2011, at 14:59, Isaac Sanders <isaacbfsanders@gmail.com> wrote:
ERB or Haml?
Vote here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/columbusrb/drKGNJFX5pQ
Depends, I use both on my site.
Also, ERB has an advantage of being embeddable everywhere, whereas Haml only
renders HTML.
···
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Isaac Sanders <isaacbfsanders@gmail.com>wrote:
ERB or Haml?
Vote here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/columbusrb/drKGNJFX5pQ
No experience with erb (or haml in ruby, either), but I've used scalatra
(Sinatra for scala) and it uses a flavor of haml (scaml). Man, that
sentence looks like lisp. Anyway, I really like haml. It is very
terse, very light. I like that the understand that the world is made of
div's and make it very clean to declare them. For all that I know, ERB
might do the same.
Anyway, of all of the frameworks and such that I've used/played with, I
like this best...
···
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Cheek [mailto:josh.cheek@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 7:56 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: ERB or Haml?
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Isaac Sanders <isaacbfsanders@gmail.com>wrote:
ERB or Haml?
Vote here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/columbusrb/drKGNJFX5pQ
Depends, I use both on my site.
Also, ERB has an advantage of being embeddable everywhere, whereas Haml
only renders HTML.
How about Markaby? It's a bit like Haml and I, for one, like
understanding what will happen without learning quirks of yet another
syntax.
···
2011/10/5, Nation, Carey <Carey.Nation@turner.com>:
No experience with erb (or haml in ruby, either), but I've used scalatra
(Sinatra for scala) and it uses a flavor of haml (scaml). Man, that
sentence looks like lisp. Anyway, I really like haml. It is very
terse, very light. I like that the understand that the world is made of
div's and make it very clean to declare them. For all that I know, ERB
might do the same.Anyway, of all of the frameworks and such that I've used/played with, I
like this best...-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Cheek [mailto:josh.cheek@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 7:56 PM
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: ERB or Haml?On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Isaac Sanders > <isaacbfsanders@gmail.com>wrote:
ERB or Haml?
Vote here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/columbusrb/drKGNJFX5pQ
Depends, I use both on my site.
Also, ERB has an advantage of being embeddable everywhere, whereas Haml
only renders HTML.
--
-- Matma Rex
···
2011/10/5 Bartosz Dziewoński <matma.rex@gmail.com>
How about Markaby? It's a bit like Haml and I, for one, like
understanding what will happen without learning quirks of yet another
syntax.2011/10/5, Nation, Carey <Carey.Nation@turner.com>:
> No experience with erb (or haml in ruby, either), but I've used scalatra
> (Sinatra for scala) and it uses a flavor of haml (scaml). Man, that
> sentence looks like lisp. Anyway, I really like haml. It is very
> terse, very light. I like that the understand that the world is made of
> div's and make it very clean to declare them. For all that I know, ERB
> might do the same.
>
> Anyway, of all of the frameworks and such that I've used/played with, I
> like this best...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Cheek [mailto:josh.cheek@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 7:56 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: ERB or Haml?
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Isaac Sanders > > <isaacbfsanders@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> ERB or Haml?
>>
>> Vote here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/columbusrb/drKGNJFX5pQ
>>
>
> Depends, I use both on my site.
>
> Also, ERB has an advantage of being embeddable everywhere, whereas Haml
> only renders HTML.
>
>--
-- Matma Rex
--
Sincerely,
Isaac Sanders
Section C-4B Vice Chief, Order of the Arrow
Vice Chief of Administration, Tecumseh #65
Eagle Scout