Enumerable

Am new to Ruby and have the folloiwng Question.

I have a class, say Collect, and I want to mixin Enumerable. How do I
write the each method in Collect?

class Collect
  include Enumerable
  def initialize()
    @array = Array.new(0)
    @ct = 0
  end
  def add(item)
    @array.push(item)
    @ct += 1
  end
  def howmany
    @ct
  end
  def each

···

#
  # Not sure how to do this???
  #
  end
end

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Assuming you want to iterate over @array,

def each
  @array.each {|i| yield i}
end

martin

···

On 8/1/06, Michael Saltzman <michael@trainingetc.com> wrote:

Am new to Ruby and have the folloiwng Question.

I have a class, say Collect, and I want to mixin Enumerable. How do I
write the each method in Collect?

class Collect
        include Enumerable
        def initialize()
                @array = Array.new(0)
                @ct = 0
        end
        def add(item)
                @array.push(item)
                @ct += 1
        end
        def howmany
                @ct
        end
        def each
        #
        # Not sure how to do this???
        #
        end
end

It depends what you want each to do? Just to wrap @array.each? In that case,
this would work:
def each
  @array.each {|item| yield item}
end

Of course you can do whatever you want to the array item in the block before
you yield it again.

An alternative technique is as follows:
def each(&block)
  @array.each(&block)
end

I'm sure someone will correct me if I describe this slightly wonky, but the
basic idea is that the interpreter converts the block argument to a proc with
a name (I think I read an article that claimed a block is always converted to
a proc, but when no &arg is given, it is simply a proc with no name,
accessible of course via yield). This is then passed on to @array.each as a
block argument.

I don't know whether there are any real advantages or disadvantages to either
method. Hope this helps

Alex

···

On Tuesday 01 August 2006 16:43, Michael Saltzman wrote:

Am new to Ruby and have the folloiwng Question.

I have a class, say Collect, and I want to mixin Enumerable. How do I
write the each method in Collect?

class Collect
  include Enumerable
  def initialize()
    @array = Array.new(0)
    @ct = 0
  end
  def add(item)
    @array.push(item)
    @ct += 1
  end
  def howmany
    @ct
  end
  def each
  #
  # Not sure how to do this???
  #
  end
end

Michael Saltzman wrote:

Am new to Ruby and have the folloiwng Question.

I have a class, say Collect, and I want to mixin Enumerable. How do I write the each method in Collect?

class Collect
  include Enumerable
  def initialize()
    @array = Array.new(0)
    @ct = 0
  end
  def add(item)
    @array.push(item)
    @ct += 1
  end
  def howmany
    @ct
  end
  def each
  #
  # Not sure how to do this???
  #
  end
end

You have several options:

class Collect
   include Enumerable

   def initialize()
     @array =
   end

   def add(item)
     @array.push(item)
     self
   end

   alias :<< :add

   def howmany
     @array.size
   end

   # option 1: use yield
   def each_1
     @array.each {|x| yield x}
     self
   end

   # option 2: delegate to Array's each
   def each_2(&b)
     @array.each(&b)
     self
   end
end

Kind regards

  robert

It depends what you want each to do? Just to wrap @array.each? In that
case, this would work:
def each
  @array.each {|item| yield item}
end

Of course you can do whatever you want to the array item in the block
before you yield it again.

An alternative technique is as follows:
def each(&block)
  @array.each(&block)
end

<snip>

I don't know whether there are any real advantages or disadvantages to
either method. Hope this helps

Just did a quick benchmark out of curiosity:
                              user system total real
Two yields 15.720000 2.220000 17.940000 ( 20.336562)
Pass the named block 4.130000 1.020000 5.150000 ( 5.562950)
Direct on attr_accessor 3.810000 1.010000 4.820000 ( 5.440259)

I passed the block {|i| i} and initialized @array to (1..100).to_a, and ran
through 50000 times.

Alex

···

On Tuesday 01 August 2006 17:06, A. S. Bradbury wrote: