Hi,
I've just checked out this: http://ruby.cenophobie.com/RubyCheat.pdf
Ruby cheat sheet. On the second page, DateTime is mentioned but when I
try the following:
DateTime::now
or
DateTime.now
it says that the constant DateTime is uninitalized.
Can anyone help?
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
it says that the constant DateTime is uninitalized.
Can anyone help?
Sure. You should add this line:
require ‘date’
you can find some more examples on date/time and other simple exercises on my blog:
http://www.rubyrailways.com/implementing-15-exercises-for-learning-a-new-programming-language/
HTH,
Peter
···
__
http://www.rubyrailways.com
"Lucas Holland" typed:
DateTime::now
or
DateTime.now
it says that the constant DateTime is uninitalized.
There is also "Time.now" which, as I see it, does not require any
module(s) to be loaded explicitly by the user. I haven't checked yet, but
do the two differ in any other way than the format in which they report
time?
···
--
Ayaz Ahmed Khan
It is impossible to defend perfectly against the attack of those who
want to die.
Peter Szinek wrote:
Sure. You should add this line:
require ‘date’
Thanks a lot, Peter. It works fine now.
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
This older thread might clear up the confusion between DateTime and Time:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/96071
- rob
···
On 12/18/06, Ayaz Ahmed Khan <ayaz@dev.slash.null> wrote:
"Lucas Holland" typed:
> DateTime::now
> or
> DateTime.now
>
> it says that the constant DateTime is uninitalized.
There is also "Time.now" which, as I see it, does not require any
module(s) to be loaded explicitly by the user. I haven't checked yet, but
do the two differ in any other way than the format in which they report
time?
--