Hi All,
We are trying to review some OO applicative code written in ruby. We explored Rdoc but it seems to us a little bit complex, digging in the YARRA we found a lot of interesting stuff, but it is either too much simple, or too much complicated. Can you suggest something object oriented and with a dimension of about 10-15 classes?
TIA
Davide
I’m not sure what you find difficult about RDoc; it’s a simple
text-based documentation tool. It’s not really built for code
reviews but for documentation of the code while you’re writing it.
-austin
– Austin Ziegler, austin@halostatue.ca on 2002.12.17 at 08.12.37
···
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:51:32 +0900, Davide Varvello wrote:
We are trying to review some OO applicative code written in ruby.
We explored Rdoc but it seems to us a little bit complex, digging
in the YARRA we found a lot of interesting stuff, but it is either
too much simple, or too much complicated. Can you suggest
something object oriented and with a dimension of about 10-15
classes?
Hi All,
We are trying to review some OO applicative code written in ruby. We
explored Rdoc but it seems to us a little bit complex, digging in the YARRA we
found a lot of interesting stuff, but it is either too much simple, or too much
complicated. Can you suggest something object oriented and with a dimension of
about 10-15 classes?
TIA
Davide
I’m not sure exactly what you’re after, but if RDoc is the right sort of thing,
just “too complex”, I’d say that you should still give it a go. Its fantastic
feature is that it produces excellent output with no effort - just cd to your
base source directory and type “rdoc”, and you get nice HTML output!
It’s great for code review when you select the --inline-source (or whatever)
option.
Cheers,
Gavin
···
From: “Davide Varvello” D.Varvello@quinary.com
CGIKit
postgres
CGIKit is really interesting too.
-a
···
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Davide Varvello wrote:
Hi All,
We are trying to review some OO applicative code written in ruby. We explored Rdoc but it seems to us a little bit complex, digging in the YARRA we found a lot of interesting stuff, but it is either too much simple, or too much complicated. Can you suggest something object oriented and with a dimension of about 10-15 classes?
TIA
Davide
–
====================================
Ara Howard
NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory
Information and Technology Services
Data Systems Group
R/FST 325 Broadway
Boulder, CO 80305-3328
Email: ahoward@fsl.noaa.gov
Phone: 303-497-7238
Fax: 303-497-7259
====================================
Just a hunch, I think the Davide is after a Ruby package of about 10-15
classes in size that he can examine for OO design and idioms. I think he
wants to actually go through the code, not really use the package.
Signed,
Holden Glova
···
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:13, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:51:32 +0900, Davide Varvello wrote:
We are trying to review some OO applicative code written in ruby.
We explored Rdoc but it seems to us a little bit complex, digging
in the YARRA we found a lot of interesting stuff, but it is either
too much simple, or too much complicated. Can you suggest
something object oriented and with a dimension of about 10-15
classes?I’m not sure what you find difficult about RDoc; it’s a simple
text-based documentation tool. It’s not really built for code
reviews but for documentation of the code while you’re writing it.-austin
– Austin Ziegler, austin@halostatue.ca on 2002.12.17 at 08.12.37