class Sup
@@x = “A”
def test
print @@x
end
end
class Sub1 < Sup
@@x = “B”
end
class Sub2 < Sup
@@x = “C”
end
Sup.new.test
Sub1.new.test
Sub2.new.test
CCC
I think I know whats going on.
When a variable is first used, that is where it is
declared. Unlike Java there is no separate
declaration. If you like, declaration is automatic
when the variable is first reference.
So Sup is declared. Class variable @@x is referenced
and associated with Sup.
Sup1 is declared. @@x is referenced. @@x is not
found in the current class, so super.@@x is
referenced.
@@x is found, and updated.
Note thae @@x = “B” is part of the classes
declaration, and so will always be invoked, and that
the ‘message’ will be passed back to Sup, thus
updating the value of @@x in Sup.
Same thing happens all over again in Sup2.
Here is the code to get the desired result.
class Sup
@@x = nil
writer: @@x
def initialize
@@x = “A”
end
def test
print @@x
end
end
class Sub1 < Sup
def initialize
@@x = “B”
end
end
class Sub2 < Sup
def initialize
@@x = “C”
end
end
Sup.new.test
Sub1.new.test
Sub2.new.test
ABC
However, things still don’t work out right if we
assign to variables first. Replace the last three
lines with:
s = Sup.new
s1a = Sub1.new
s1b = Sub1.new
s2a = Sub2.new
s2b = Sub2.new
s.test
s1a.test
s1b.test
s2a.test
s2b.test
CCC
Is this suprising? Perhaps not, here is the
equivalent Java code:
class sup {
static char x = ‘A’;
void test() {
System.out.print(x);
}
}
class sup1 extends sup {
{ x = ‘B’; }
}
class sup2 extends sup {
{ x = ‘C’; }
}
CCC
The original scenario cannot be replicated in Java
because a class is loaded and initialised at first
use, rather than at declaration.
class sup {
static char x;
sup() {
x = ‘A’;
}
void test() {
System.out.print(x);
}
}
class sup1 extends sup {
static char x;
sup1() {
x = ‘B’;
}
void test() {
System.out.print(x);
}
}
class sup2 extends sup {
static char x;
sup2() {
x = ‘C’;
}
void test() {
System.out.print(x);
}
}
I can’t find any cleaner way to do this in Java.
Remove either the duplicate declaration of x or test()
and your back to the original problem.
So whats the best approach in ruby? To keep a class
hash that contains a value associated with each class?
···
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/
