I had problems w.r.t. performance of Marshal.dump in one of my
applications, so I tested if it was *that* better to dump objects by sets
instead of one by one. The results are here:
http://www.jhaampe.org/software/marshal-perf-ruby
--
Sylvain Joyeux
Thanks for sharing this, it is also very comforting to know that for
an application that does few things but *fast* Ruby still seems fast
enough 
Salut
Robert
On 5/5/07, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@polytechnique.org> wrote:
I had problems w.r.t. performance of Marshal.dump in one of my
applications, so I tested if it was *that* better to dump objects by sets
instead of one by one. The results are here:http://www.jhaampe.org/software/marshal-perf-ruby
--
Sylvain Joyeux
--
You see things; and you say Why?
But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
-- George Bernard Shaw
Thanks for sharing this, it is also very comforting to know that for
an application that does few things but *fast* Ruby still seems fast
enough
Lol. The only real problem I have with Ruby's performance is its GC ... I
have cycles that should be around 100ms and the GC will sometime take
ages.
--
Sylvain Joyeux