hey ...
I want to make sure that I understand the subtle difference in the
syntax.
my_array[0,3]
and
my_array[0..2]
both will return the same array elements - correct?
the first _says_: "start at index0 & gimme 3"
the latter _say_: "start at index0 and goto index2"
If the data requirements start at >index0, then there is no offset
between the "gimme" and the 'goto".
Am I getting it?
--
Duke
Duke Normandin wrote in post #994657:
hey ...
I want to make sure that I understand the subtle difference in the
syntax.my_array[0,3]
and
my_array[0..2]
both will return the same array elements - correct?
If someone had a gun to your head and told you that you had 30 seconds
to provide an answer to that question, what would you do?
the first _says_: "start at index0 & gimme 3"
the latter _say_: "start at index0 and goto index2"
Where is the ruby documentation located?
If the data requirements start at >index0, then there is no offset
between the "gimme" and the 'goto".Am I getting it?
No.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
hey ...
I want to make sure that I understand the subtle difference in the
syntax.my_array[0,3]
and
my_array[0..2]
both will return the same array elements - correct?
the first _says_: "start at index0 & gimme 3"
the latter _say_: "start at index0 and goto index2"If the data requirements start at >index0, then there is no offset
between the "gimme" and the 'goto".Am I getting it?
--
Duke
IDK, but a quick study of behaviour should make it very obvious:
numbers = *0...10 # => [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
numbers[0,3] # => [0, 1, 2]
numbers[1,3] # => [1, 2, 3]
numbers[2,3] # => [2, 3, 4]
numbers[3,3] # => [3, 4, 5]
numbers[0,4] # => [0, 1, 2, 3]
numbers[1,4] # => [1, 2, 3, 4]
numbers[2,4] # => [2, 3, 4, 5]
numbers[3,4] # => [3, 4, 5, 6]
numbers[0..5] # => [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
numbers[1..5] # => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
numbers[2..5] # => [2, 3, 4, 5]
numbers[3..5] # => [3, 4, 5]
numbers[3..7] # => [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
numbers[4..7] # => [4, 5, 6, 7]
numbers[5..7] # => [5, 6, 7]
numbers[6..7] # => [6, 7]
numbers[7..7] # => [7]
If you're using TextMate, you can update the comments with
command+control+shift+e. Otherwise, you might try entering each line into
irb, and it will update for you the correct value. Or you could write a
program to cycle through inputs and print the values, something like:
numbers = *0...10
(0..3).each do |start|
result = numbers[start,3]
puts "numbers[#{start},3] # => #{result.inspect}"
end
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Duke Normandin <dukeofperl@ml1.net> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:02 PM, 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> wrote:
If someone had a gun to your head and told you that you had 30 seconds
to provide an answer to that question, what would you do?
Ruby is serious business.
> hey ...
>
> I want to make sure that I understand the subtle difference in the
> syntax.
[snip]
>
IDK, but a quick study of behaviour should make it very obvious:
[snip the good stuff]
Thanks for _all_ that!
However, I think that I summarized it in my original post, exactly as
you are showing it above. My definition of "gimme" and "goto" may not
be as clear as what I had hoped it would be. No matter! I'll check my
understanding of the issue against what you've provided above. Much
obliged!
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Josh Cheek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Duke Normandin <dukeofperl@ml1.net> wrote:
--
Duke