I don't think anyone on the list has noticed this yet, but someone has put
up a new Ruby API site that allows user annotations, much like the
php.netsite. I love
ruby-doc.org, but I have to say the API wiki doesn't work for me. I've never
found content on it the few times I've clicked, and since there is no
indcation in the documents what MIGHT have content, I've got little
incentive to go and look. I think this solution is very slick, and whats
more its based on a project called RAnnonate.
http://ruby.outertrack.com/
Justin
That is slick! It would be great if RoR docs had that feature!
Justin Bailey wrote:
···
I don't think anyone on the list has noticed this yet, but someone has put
up a new Ruby API site that allows user annotations, much like the
php.netsite. I love
ruby-doc.org, but I have to say the API wiki doesn't work for me. I've never
found content on it the few times I've clicked, and since there is no
indcation in the documents what MIGHT have content, I've got little
incentive to go and look. I think this solution is very slick, and whats
more its based on a project called RAnnonate.
http://ruby.outertrack.com/
Justin
I don't think anyone on the list has noticed this yet, but someone has put
up a new Ruby API site that allows user annotations, much like the
php.netsite. I love
ruby-doc.org, but I have to say the API wiki doesn't work for me. I've never
found content on it the few times I've clicked, and since there is no
indcation in the documents what MIGHT have content, I've got little
incentive to go and look. I think this solution is very slick, and whats
more its based on a project called RAnnonate.
http://ruby.outertrack.com/
Absolutely amazing. I had suggested this for the Summer of Code (many
others had suggested it before me), but didn't think we'd have one
this soon. It's gorgeous.
A huge thank you to Conor, Jamis, Matias, and Justin.
···
On 5/18/06, Justin Bailey <jgbailey@gmail.com> wrote:
Justin
--
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)
The best answer to most questions is "it depends".
Justin Bailey wrote:
http://ruby.outertrack.com/
Looks like it had/has parser/generator problems. Example:
http://ruby.outertrack.com/class/String/chomp
Pistos
···
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/\.
That is slick! It would be great if RoR docs had that feature!
You mean like?
http://rails.outertrack.com/
I saw this a few months ago at a NYC.rb meeting
I just had assumed it had been publicly announced already, otherwise I
would have thrown a link.
···
On 5/18/06, Bill Guindon <agorilla@gmail.com> wrote:
Absolutely amazing. I had suggested this for the Summer of Code (many
others had suggested it before me), but didn't think we'd have one
this soon. It's gorgeous.
Steven Hansen <runner@berkeley.edu> writes:
That is slick! It would be great if RoR docs had that feature!
You can always hoodwink.
-Phil Hagelberg
Yes, exactly like that 
. *Bookmarked*
brabuhr@gmail.com wrote:
···
That is slick! It would be great if RoR docs had that feature!
You mean like?
http://rails.outertrack.com/
Recently there has been a big push by the rails devs to get users to contribute documentation to the API. I am all for this! However, adding documentation is like submitting a patch. To me, it seems like pushing people towards:
http://rails.outertrack.com/
would be more productive as it makes adding documentation much easier.
Gregory Brown wrote:
···
On 5/18/06, Bill Guindon <agorilla@gmail.com> wrote:
Absolutely amazing. I had suggested this for the Summer of Code (many
others had suggested it before me), but didn't think we'd have one
this soon. It's gorgeous.
I saw this a few months ago at a NYC.rb meeting
I just had assumed it had been publicly announced already, otherwise I
would have thrown a link.
It seems you're right. It's been discussed since late last year, and
announced 2 days ago, but only on the Rails list (which I haven't been
reading lately).
http://rubyurl.com/v9u
···
On 5/18/06, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/18/06, Bill Guindon <agorilla@gmail.com> wrote:
> Absolutely amazing. I had suggested this for the Summer of Code (many
> others had suggested it before me), but didn't think we'd have one
> this soon. It's gorgeous.
I saw this a few months ago at a NYC.rb meeting
I just had assumed it had been publicly announced already, otherwise I
would have thrown a link.
--
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)
The best answer to most questions is "it depends".
Phil Hagelberg wrote:
Steven Hansen <runner@berkeley.edu> writes:
That is slick! It would be great if RoR docs had that feature!
You can always hoodwink.
True for ruby-doc.org, too.
···
--
James Britt
http://www.ruby-doc.org - Ruby Help & Documentation
Ruby Code & Style - The Journal By & For Rubyists
http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://yourelevatorpitch.com - Finding Business Focus