[ANN] Usage 0.0.2 - Yet another command line option processor

What is Usage?

···

===========

Usage is simple way to access command line parameters for quick scripts that you write where you don't want to even think about command line processing. It handles many simple cases but does not have enough power to handle complicated option processing.

How can I get it?

gem install Usage

Where is it at?

http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/usage/

Show me some examples

1. Simple Usage

The only thing you have remember to use usage are how commands are usually documented.
First you need to require the usage library:

    require "Usage"

Then set up the usage string for the command:

    usage = Usage.new "infile outfile"

The above would be a command with two require arguments: an input file and an output file.
To access those arguments, you just need to use the usage variable that was created and
send the .infile or .outfile message to them.

    File.open(usage.infile) do |fi|
        File.open(usage.outfile, "w") do |fo|
            fo.write(fi.read)
        end
    end

If the user doesn't supply the correct number of arguments, the program exits with an error
and the usage for the program (hence the libraries name).

    PROGRAM: test.rb
    ERROR: too few arguments 2 expected, 0 given

    USAGE: test.rb infile outfile

2. Lists of files (...)

You can write a program that accepts a list of files by using elipses appended to an
argument (the following program concatenates the input files into one output file).

    usage = Usage.new "outfile infiles..."

    File.open(usage.outfile, "w") do |fo|
        usage.infiles.each do |infile|
            File.open(usage.infile) { |fi| fo.write(fi.read)}
        end
    end

3. Optional arguments

You can have optional arguments by surounding them in square brackets.

    usage = Usage.new "required_arg [optional_arg] "

These are accessed in the standard way

    usage.optional_arg # this is nil if it is not given by the user

    usage.required_arg

4. Options

You can have dash options that are either required or optional. Options can also have
arguments associated with them.

    usage = Usage.new "[-y] [-x excluded_tags] (-z ztag) (-w warning_arg) files..."

The options are accessed with "dash_" prefixing the option so that the -y is accessed
via .dash_y. The -x can be accessed either with #dash_x (which would be either nil or
true) or #excluded_tags (which would be either nil or the argument for the -x option).
The -z option is required and has one argument, also the -w option is also required.
They can appear in any order (-z option first or -w option first). The optional arguments
can appear either before, interspersed with, or after the required options.

5. Long Options

You can also have long options by including lines following the initial usage line that
associates the short options with the long ones. Example below:

    usage = Usage.new "-x files...", <<EOT
    -x,--exclusive specifies exclusive access to the files
    EOT

With this case, now #dash_x and #exclusive give the same result when applied to the usage
variable.

6. Typed options

In order to remove a step and improve argument checking, you can also add in a "type"
character to identify its type. The characters I used are somewhat arbitrary. Some of
them I took from BASIC which I programmed in long long ago.

    % - Integer
    $ - String (but this is unnecessary as this is default)
    # - Float
    @ - Date-Time

So when you send the argument message to the usage object, you will get a value of that
type and if the user does not give that type, then they get an error message.

    usage = Usage.new "%num_times @on_date"

In this example, #num_times returns and Integer object and #on_date returns a Time object.

7. Choice options

You can have optional options that have a set of values which they can be. The choices
are separated by pipe symbols. See below:

    usage = Usage.new "[-a coffee|tea|milk]"

After this #dash_a will give the string coffee, tea, or milk. If the value given isn't
one of the given choices, then the user is given an error message with the
appropriate choices.

Steve Tuckner

I have no opinion on this library as such, but can I ask a couple of
favours for future releases of this and other libraries?

1. RubyGems is, inexplicably, case-sensitive. Can you please make sure
   that your gem names themselves are lowercased?
2. Can we avoid, in the future, library file names with capital letters?
   Unix folk might enjoy having "Makefile" and "makefile" in the same
   directory, but the rest of us don't and therefore have smarter
   case-preserving filesystems. I would much rather do "require 'usage'"
   than "require 'Usage'".

I would also argue that "usage" may be too common and could perhaps be
namespaced (e.g., SimpleUsage, UsageSimple, Simple::Usage,
Usage::Simple, or somesuch as appropriate).

Beyond that, I haven't really read the announcement -- but
congratulations on the release in any case. :wink:

-austin

···

On 9/21/05, stevetuckner <stevetuckner@usfamily.net> wrote:

What is Usage?
[...]
gem install Usage
[...]
    require "Usage"

--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca

Austin Ziegler wrote:

Beyond that, I haven't really read the announcement -- but
congratulations on the release in any case. :wink:

i think you should. :slight_smile:
I did and will definitly try this lib next time i need something like that.

Steve, keep it up, i like it...
(But of course it would be even better if you could follow austin's suggestions)

cheers

Simon

Austin Ziegler wrote:

What is Usage?
[...]
gem install Usage
[...]
   require "Usage"
   
I have no opinion on this library as such, but can I ask a couple of
favours for future releases of this and other libraries?

1. RubyGems is, inexplicably, case-sensitive. Can you please make sure
  that your gem names themselves are lowercased?

I have never released a library before (on this list), so I guess I am not sure about where I should know the ettiquite for case-sensitivity of library names. I just named mine in line with the actual class name. I did notice that RAA requires lower case names. That was long after I had created a ruby forge project, etc. Also, there are 45 other gem packages with staring Upper case letters (see gem.rubyforge.org -- snippet below), included BlueCloth and RedCloth!

Asami-0.04.gem 05-Dec-2004 06:50 163k Bangkok-0.1.0.gem 25-Mar-2005 09:50 39k Bloglines4R-0.1.0.gem 16-Jan-2005 10:55 6k ....
Wiki2Go-1.16.1.gem 04-Sep-2005 15:05 121k XDCC-Fetch-1.409.gem 13-Feb-2005 10:15 158k ZenHacks-1.0.1.gem 14-Jul-2005 03:45 30k

2. Can we avoid, in the future, library file names with capital letters?
  Unix folk might enjoy having "Makefile" and "makefile" in the same
  directory, but the rest of us don't and therefore have smarter
  case-preserving filesystems. I would much rather do "require 'usage'"
  than "require 'Usage'".

Why doesn't it make sense to require a library name with the same case as the class name?

I would also argue that "usage" may be too common and could perhaps be
namespaced (e.g., SimpleUsage, UsageSimple, Simple::Usage,
Usage::Simple, or somesuch as appropriate).

I will think about re-releasing this as SimpleUsage.

Beyond that, I haven't really read the announcement -- but
congratulations on the release in any case. :wink:

Thanks. After years of just lurking I am finally starting to release some stuff.

···

On 9/21/05, stevetuckner <stevetuckner@usfamily.net> wrote:

-austin
--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
              * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca