Hi Mark,
Cool that you did this, but I'd like to make a request...
What I think would be really, really useful, more than the dmg itself,
is if you posted the steps you used to build the .dmg, so that anybody
could remake it.
Maybe you could do a write up on
http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?RubyOnMacintosh
Is the process automatable? If so, perhaps I (or somebody) could
set something up to have nightly/weekly ruby snapshots built into
dmgs, and the various stable versions archived.
Last time I posted a package, it wasn't automated at all, and someone
asked the same question... Well, now my process is partially
automated; downloading, building, and sorting of the installed files
is automated, packaging is not. Packaging is the most important part
for automation, afaic. I need to research making packages via non-gui
tools, which may or may not be fairly complicated. I'll have to see.
Sticking the products in a disk image could be automated easily;
unless you want to design how it will be presented in the Finder, with
background images, icon placement, etc. That would be more involved.
I'm a bit afraid to invest too much time working on this; the
OneClickInstaller project seems to be moving ahead on the mac
platform, and it will definitely supersede my efforts So, at the
moment, I haven't been working much on this project. If you want, I
could clean up the code a bit and post it somewhere, but it's really
pretty simple at this point.
Speaking of which, are there nightly builds/tests of ruby done anywhere?
I've a farm of build machines at work (many dozens of OS versions and
architectures). They might let me set up daily builds for ruby, if the
tests don't take up too much cpu time.
One reason that it would be nice to know how to make these, is I don't
want the choice of which ruby to be based on the path, I use the
--program-transform-name=PROGRAM
option to ruby's configure to add a suffix to all the installed ruby
executables, so irb18 is from ruby 1.8, etc.
I'd like that myself... is it possible, then, to have both ruby 1.9
and ruby 1.8 installed in the same prefix? I haven't looked into this
much (okay, not at all)
cheers,
Mark
···
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:26:39 -0500, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote: