[ANN] Ruby-FLTK 0.9.2

ruby-talk
1

Ruby-FLTK 0.9.2 , 2005-07-03
http://ruby-fltk.sourceforge.net/

"Let your Yes be Yes, or indeed anything other than false or nil."

What is this?:

Ruby-FLTK is a Ruby binding for the FLTK (Fast, Light Toolkit) GUI
library.

Release notes:

Headlines!:
- Mostly fixes, cleanups, typos.
- New color/cursor constants.
- New test scripts.

This is very much a "cleanup" release rather than "new functionality",
as I am still familiarising myself with the code base. If there's
something you're keen to see in 0.9.3 , now is the time to let me
know.

CHANGES:

0.9.1 -> 0.9.2

···

---------------------------------------------
* Added the file "test/boxes.rb".
* Added the file "test/colors.rb".
* Added the DARK_* color constants.
* Added the file "test/cursors.rb".
* Added the missing *_CURSOR constants.
* "ruby extconf.rb --help" now *only* prints the help text
* Eliminated the deprecated "rb_f_lambda".
* Lots of cleanups and fixes to {test/samples}/*.rb .

Cheers,

Jeremy Henty
jeremy_henty@sourceforge.net

--
Father Duck worries that Ruby won't catch up. But Mother Duck knows
that Ruby will flourish ... in her own time.
-- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j.emmett/art/ruby1/ruby1.html

2

Hello Jeremy,

This is very much a "cleanup" release rather than "new functionality",
as I am still familiarising myself with the code base. If there's
something you're keen to see in 0.9.3 , now is the time to let me
know.

Did you cleanup enough to make it a Ruby GEM ?
If not then think this would be the most important goal for the
future. I will download on windows and check the compilation process
against ms-vc++.

···

--
Best regards, emailto: scholz at scriptolutions dot com
Lothar Scholz http://www.ruby-ide.com
CTO Scriptolutions Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's

3

In article <1475819562.20050704074011@scriptolutions.com>, Lothar
Scholz wrote:

Did you cleanup enough to make it a Ruby GEM ?

I don't know what it would take to make it a gem. Luckily I just
bought Pickaxe II, so I know where to find out.

If not then think this would be the most important goal for the
future.

What's the status of gems as the way to package Ruby code? I saw a
lot of debate but didn't pay enough attention to see the outcome. Is
it really a no-brainer that gems are the way to go?

I will download on windows and check the compilation process against
ms-vc++.

Thanks, let me know how it goes.

Cheers,

Jeremy