Mauricio Fernández [mailto:batsman.geo@yahoo.com] annnounced;
First public release of rpa-base. =================================
Thanks.
Btw, if I use the packager, do I need to change anything in my ruby
programs? In rubygems, I have to add require_gem eg.
kind regards -botp
Mauricio Fernández [mailto:batsman.geo@yahoo.com] annnounced;
First public release of rpa-base. =================================
Thanks.
Btw, if I use the packager, do I need to change anything in my ruby
programs? In rubygems, I have to add require_gem eg.
Actually, because of our stub capability, you don't need to do require_gem
anymore.
You can just:
require "ruvi"
And it now works. The 'stub' is a file in site_ruby/1.8 (named ruvi.rb)
which contains:
require 'rubygems'
require_gem 'ruvi'
So, require_gem is not longer necessary UNLESS you need to require a
particular version of a library. In that case you need the require_gem
because it takes the optional second parameter that holds the version
requriement.
-rich
On 6/16/04 9:46 PM, "Peña, Botp" <botp@delmonte-phil.com> wrote:
kind regards -botp
Your programs would work unmodified: rpa-base can (and does) manage
files in all of $prefix/ and is not restricted to a single directory
per package.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:46:20AM +0900, "Peña, Botp" wrote:
> First public release of rpa-base. =================================
Thanks.
Btw, if I use the packager, do I need to change anything in my ruby
programs? In rubygems, I have to add require_gem eg.
--
Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com
*** PUBLIC flooding detected from erikyyy
<lewnie> THAT's an erik, pholx.... 
-- Seen on #LinuxGER
wow, that's cool, I have not noticed this change 
il Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:56:43 +0900, Richard Kilmer <rich@infoether.com> ha scritto::
Actually, because of our stub capability, you don't need to do require_gem
anymore.