rc-rest version 2.2.0 has been released!
http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/rc-rest
This library makes it easy to implement REST-like web services APIs.
Changes:
= 2.2.0
* Moved to seattlerb rubyforge project
* Moved to p4
* Wrap communication errors in RCRest::CommunicationError
http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/rc-rest
Does this currently only send get and post requests? What about put and delete?
I understand that we can look at the gems yahoo-search, google-geocode and geocoder-us for examples, but is their a simpler example somewhere that demonstrates client and server pieces?
···
On Jan 29, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
rc-rest version 2.2.0 has been released!
http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/rc-rest
This library makes it easy to implement REST-like web services APIs.
Changes:
= 2.2.0
* Moved to seattlerb rubyforge project
* Moved to p4
* Wrap communication errors in RCRest::CommunicationError
http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/rc-rest
rc-rest version 2.2.0 has been released!
http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/rc-rest
This library makes it easy to implement REST-like web services APIs.
Changes:
= 2.2.0
* Moved to seattlerb rubyforge project
* Moved to p4
* Wrap communication errors in RCRest::CommunicationError
http://seattlerb.rubyforge.org/rc-rest
Does this currently only send get and post requests? What about put and delete?
Adding PUT and DELETE would be super-simple. I've never needed it, though. Give me a simple API using PUT and DELETE to wrap up and I can add it in a few weeks time (I've got plans for other projects in my queue). Or you can add it yourself and send me a patch. rc-rest.rb is only 279 lines and is well-tested.
I understand that we can look at the gems yahoo-search, google-geocode and geocoder-us for examples, but is their a simpler example somewhere that demonstrates client and server pieces?
rc-rest is client-side only. The documentation should contain enough information to get you started on wrapping an API.
ri RCRest has a super-simple GET example in it for a fake API.
···
On Jan 30, 2007, at 05:39, Mark Volkmann wrote:
On Jan 29, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Eric Hodel wrote: