Hello folks,
new version of ‘OpenSSL for Ruby’ is avaible!
----- Forwarded message from GOTOU Yuuzou gotoyuzo@notwork.org -----
Hi,
I make ossl-0.2.0-pre3.
Could you announce to ruby-talk list?
I already post it to Japanese ruby-list.
regards,
–
ossl-0.2.0-pre3 has been just released.
What’s new?
few bugfixes
S/MIME handling methods
some fix of PKCS#7 interface
OCSP module
Where to download?
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/rubypki/ossl-0.2.0-pre3.tgz
MD5 (ossl-0.2.0-pre3.tgz) = ab74ce3d2f7eab9502868974da837179
–
gotoyuzo
----- End forwarded message -----
What else to say?
This release is thanks to gotoyuzo and NaHi. Thanks! Great job!
Michal
(that did nothing)
···
–
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Michal Rokos Czech Technical University, Prague
e-mail: m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz icq: 36118339 jabber: majkl@jabber.cz
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
There is one problem ATM. It works only with OpenSSL 0.9.7*, anything
earlier is incompatible while many people still use 0.9.6j.
···
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:06:28AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
In message “[Ann] OSSL 0.2.0-pre3” > on 03/07/15, Michal Rokos m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz writes:
What else to say?
Can I merge this in the 1.8? Gotoyuzo, who is working for my company,
told me to ask Michal.
–
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Military intelligence is a contradiction in terms.
– Groucho Marx
In message 20030715091319.GH30869@sam-solutions.net,
···
`Alexander Bokovoy a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net’ wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:06:28AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
In message “[Ann] OSSL 0.2.0-pre3” > > on 03/07/15, Michal Rokos m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz writes:
What else to say?
Can I merge this in the 1.8? Gotoyuzo, who is working for my company,
told me to ask Michal.
There is one problem ATM. It works only with OpenSSL 0.9.7*, anything
earlier is incompatible while many people still use 0.9.6j.
If a system depends on 0.9.6, but we can install a package
of ossl-0.1.x independently. I intend to continue maintenance
of OSSL1 as long as it needed.
I made ossl-0.1.4a for OpenSSL-0.9.6.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/rubypki/ossl-0.1.4a.tar.gz
MD5 (ossl-0.1.4a.tar.gz) = 303d0473fdb1480a0936a5661d8ba8e3
–
gotoyuzo
Thank you very much, this is what I need actually.
But regarding ossl merge into Ruby 1.8, can we get both versions added?
extconf.rb could decide which to compile depending on available OpenSSL
version.
···
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:34:21PM +0900, GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:
In message 20030715091319.GH30869@sam-solutions.net,
`Alexander Bokovoy a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net’ wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:06:28AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
In message “[Ann] OSSL 0.2.0-pre3” > > > on 03/07/15, Michal Rokos m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz writes:
What else to say?
Can I merge this in the 1.8? Gotoyuzo, who is working for my company,
told me to ask Michal.
There is one problem ATM. It works only with OpenSSL 0.9.7*, anything
earlier is incompatible while many people still use 0.9.6j.
If a system depends on 0.9.6, but we can install a package
of ossl-0.1.x independently. I intend to continue maintenance
of OSSL1 as long as it needed.
I made ossl-0.1.4a for OpenSSL-0.9.6.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/rubypki/ossl-0.1.4a.tar.gz
MD5 (ossl-0.1.4a.tar.gz) = 303d0473fdb1480a0936a5661d8ba8e3
–
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Put a rogue in the limelight and he will act like an honest man.
– Napoleon Bonaparte, “Maxims”
In message 20030716094730.GB16981@sam-solutions.net,
···
`Alexander Bokovoy a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net’ wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:34:21PM +0900, GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:
In message 20030715091319.GH30869@sam-solutions.net,
`Alexander Bokovoy a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net’ wrote:
There is one problem ATM. It works only with OpenSSL 0.9.7*, anything
earlier is incompatible while many people still use 0.9.6j.
If a system depends on 0.9.6, but we can install a package
of ossl-0.1.x independently. I intend to continue maintenance
of OSSL1 as long as it needed.
I made ossl-0.1.4a for OpenSSL-0.9.6.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/rubypki/ossl-0.1.4a.tar.gz
MD5 (ossl-0.1.4a.tar.gz) = 303d0473fdb1480a0936a5661d8ba8e3
Thank you very much, this is what I need actually.
But regarding ossl merge into Ruby 1.8, can we get both versions added?
extconf.rb could decide which to compile depending on available OpenSSL
version.
Hmm, isn’t it too redundant? We haven’t modified OSSL1
except bugfixis for a year. I think it’s hard to develop
both versions. I expect that OSSL1 is going to be in
maintenance track and it will become outdated.
–
gotoyuzo
Let me reiterate the argument: there are bunch of systems which provide
only OpenSSL prior to 0.9.7 and OpenSSL 0.9.6j is still considered stable
by its developers (along with 0.9.7). If you look at http://rpm.pbone.net/
and search for openssl-*.src.rpm, you’ll find that 0.9.7 is available only
in RH9 and Mandrake 9.1 if we are speaking about big Linux distributions
(and of course in their development branches). Everything earlier is using
0.9.6. SuSE 8.2 (latest) uses 0.9.6. Debian Woody has 0.9.6 too.
Of course, development versions of these distributions might contain
0.9.7 (and most of them do so), but this is not an argument to drop support
for 0.9.6 if ossl will be merged to Ruby 1.8.
···
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:09:49PM +0900, GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:
In message 20030716094730.GB16981@sam-solutions.net,
`Alexander Bokovoy a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net’ wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:34:21PM +0900, GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:
In message 20030715091319.GH30869@sam-solutions.net,
`Alexander Bokovoy a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net’ wrote:
There is one problem ATM. It works only with OpenSSL 0.9.7*, anything
earlier is incompatible while many people still use 0.9.6j.
If a system depends on 0.9.6, but we can install a package
of ossl-0.1.x independently. I intend to continue maintenance
of OSSL1 as long as it needed.
I made ossl-0.1.4a for OpenSSL-0.9.6.
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/rubypki/ossl-0.1.4a.tar.gz
MD5 (ossl-0.1.4a.tar.gz) = 303d0473fdb1480a0936a5661d8ba8e3
Thank you very much, this is what I need actually.
But regarding ossl merge into Ruby 1.8, can we get both versions added?
extconf.rb could decide which to compile depending on available OpenSSL
version.
Hmm, isn’t it too redundant? We haven’t modified OSSL1
except bugfixis for a year. I think it’s hard to develop
both versions. I expect that OSSL1 is going to be in
maintenance track and it will become outdated.
–
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Your depth of comprehension may tend to make you lax in worldly ways.
In message 20030717084529.GA10727@sam-solutions.net,
Let me reiterate the argument: there are bunch of systems which provide
only OpenSSL prior to 0.9.7 and OpenSSL 0.9.6j is still considered stable
by its developers (along with 0.9.7). If you look at http://rpm.pbone.net/
and search for openssl-*.src.rpm, you’ll find that 0.9.7 is available only
in RH9 and Mandrake 9.1 if we are speaking about big Linux distributions
(and of course in their development branches). Everything earlier is using
0.9.6. SuSE 8.2 (latest) uses 0.9.6. Debian Woody has 0.9.6 too.
I understand what you say. I agree that the standard
libraries should be usable on most of major systems.
However, if a system requires 0.9.6, package of OSSL1 is a
solution for the problem. I think that this problem is also
from system’s requirements, and it can be solved by its
package system.
In addition, for users needing only HTTPS, net/https in
OSSL1 can be used as same as it in OSSL2.
···
`Alexander Bokovoy a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net’ wrote:
–
gotoyuzo
Yes. That’s why I’m proposing to put both during merge and make a switch
between in extconf.rb depending on presenting OpenSSL version.
···
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:08:16PM +0900, GOTOU Yuuzou wrote:
In message 20030717084529.GA10727@sam-solutions.net,
`Alexander Bokovoy a.bokovoy@sam-solutions.net’ wrote:
Let me reiterate the argument: there are bunch of systems which provide
only OpenSSL prior to 0.9.7 and OpenSSL 0.9.6j is still considered stable
by its developers (along with 0.9.7). If you look at http://rpm.pbone.net/
and search for openssl-*.src.rpm, you’ll find that 0.9.7 is available only
in RH9 and Mandrake 9.1 if we are speaking about big Linux distributions
(and of course in their development branches). Everything earlier is using
0.9.6. SuSE 8.2 (latest) uses 0.9.6. Debian Woody has 0.9.6 too.
I understand what you say. I agree that the standard
libraries should be usable on most of major systems.
However, if a system requires 0.9.6, package of OSSL1 is a
solution for the problem. I think that this problem is also
from system’s requirements, and it can be solved by its
package system.
In addition, for users needing only HTTPS, net/https in
OSSL1 can be used as same as it in OSSL2.
–
/ Alexander Bokovoy
I took a fish head to the movies and I didn’t have to pay.
– Fish Heads, Saturday Night Live, 1977.