Tom Copeland has just deployed my new RubyGems indexer in preparation for a RubyGems beta.
You should see fewer bulk index updates, and no more missing gems that you know are there.
It's supposed to be fully backwards-compatible, but I might have screwed something up.
Details:
http://tomcopeland.blogs.com/juniordeveloper/2007/10/more-reliable-g.html
http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2007/10/05/rubygems-beta-approaching
···
--
Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The
best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars
Is the fast index working yet?
Paul
···
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:04:33AM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
Tom Copeland has just deployed my new RubyGems indexer in preparation
for a RubyGems beta.
You should see fewer bulk index updates, and no more missing gems
that you know are there.
It's supposed to be fully backwards-compatible, but I might have
screwed something up.
Details:
http://tomcopeland.blogs.com/juniordeveloper/2007/10/more-reliable-
g.html
http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2007/10/05/rubygems-beta-approaching
The quick index has been in RubyGems since 0.9.2, IIRC, but the way the indexer was written the files needed for it to function were missing more than half the time.
···
On Oct 5, 2007, at 11:10 , Paul Brannan wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:04:33AM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
Tom Copeland has just deployed my new RubyGems indexer in preparation
for a RubyGems beta.
You should see fewer bulk index updates, and no more missing gems
that you know are there.
It's supposed to be fully backwards-compatible, but I might have
screwed something up.
Details:
http://tomcopeland.blogs.com/juniordeveloper/2007/10/more-reliable-
g.html
http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2007/10/05/rubygems-beta-approaching
Is the fast index working yet?
--
Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The
best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars