You can now use Instiki as a CMS with a password-protected back end
that allows for edits and a read-only, published front end with no
controls. Read all about how to set that up in HowToUseInstikiAsCMS[1].
I’m powering the Next Angle[2] site with this version.
Look forward to version 0.9: Bill Atkins is implementing color diffs[3].
Look forward to version 0.9: Bill Atkins is implementing color diffs[3].
Not sure if this was discussed before; I thought I had asked I could not
find it.
Is there any plan to have a internal representation of a page independent of
input (Textile, RDOC, …) or output (HTML) markup e.g. XML(ish) ?
Conversion loss can be handled by the usual XML approach: “don’t mess with
what you can’t understand, but make sure you pass it on through.” So in
whatever markup I choose to edit a page, I might see some parts as raw
XML(ish).
Pros:
RDOC input markup can be subsequently edited with Textile markup
Semantic markup can be minimally entered as XML(ish)
Editing can be done at level of semantic units smaller than entire page:
needs a small amount of cross-platform JScript to open edit boxes on units
smaller than entire wiki page
CSS easier exploited for such semantic markup
Cons?
Counter to the philosophy of Instiki?
Spoils the simplicity of Instiki?
Other cons?
Or have I missed something that is already there? e.g. is there already the
ability to easily create something functionally akin to
…
or even