> hitimes version 0.3.0 has been released. Now with windows support.
Looks nice. I love how accurate it is over traditional Benchmark.
Thanks!
Wish list: 1.9 use,
I'll get around to 1.9 at some point.
and also the ability to use the CPU clock counter
[maybe guess or estimate the accuracy?]. That might be faster, for
those of us that want speed over accuracy
[1] seems to use it, as an
example.
It looks like ruby-prof some assembler to get its timing calls. Unfortunately I
don't know assembler, otherwise I may have gone that route.
I went with the lowest level timing API call I could find on each system. this
means that on Windows it uses the QueryPerformanceCounter()[1] and
QueryPerformanceFrequency() combination, on OS X is uses UpTime()[2], and
everything else goes to clock_gettime()[3].
Anything to improve speed [like a C based measure, etc.]
Patches are always welcome :-). Feel free to contribute[4].
The Interval class is pure C. I may re-implement Timer in C, but not quite yet.
In hitimes, the fastest way to measure the execution time of a piece of code is:
duration = Interval.measure { # your code here }
If ther are faster ways to measure the execution of code, I would happy to
incorporate them.
enjoy,
-jeremy
[1] - QueryPerformanceCounter function - Win32 apps | Microsoft Learn
[2] - http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Hardware/DeviceManagers/pci_srvcs/pci_cards_drivers/PCI_BOOK.199.html#pgfId=4848
[3] - clock_gettime(2) - OpenBSD manual pages
[4] - GitHub - copiousfreetime/hitimes: a fast, high resolution timer library for recording performance metrics
···
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:32:25AM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
--
Jeremy Hinegardner jeremy@hinegardner.org