YAML vs. Marshal

wouldn’t that be soap? :wink: i hate xml, but this would be wheel
reinvention for sure…

Reinvention? YAML is already a serialization language. All we’re
talking about is providing a bytecode to allow efficiency where
readability isn’t needed.

I certainly think it would be cool to have both formats – both
functionally equivalent, but one being faster and the other being a
lot handier for debugging.

Maybe it’s not so much reinventing the wheel, as constructing a
unicycle… :slight_smile:
I agree. Having a couple of standards for one action is always a good thing.
So you can choose. Choice is great. That’s my opinion.

···

On Wednesday 05 May 2004 11:38, Kevin M wrote:

Kevin


sdmitry -=- Dmitry V. Sabanin
MuraveyLabs.
Spam Here → postmaster@sco.com