If you were to instrument my physical responses and typing rate while
coding using Python and Test Driven Development, and compare them to
my responses using Ruby, you’d get close to assessing the subjective
reason I ain’t going back.
This paragraph intrigues me. Am I misreading, or are you not keen on TDD?
Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought he was saying
that Ruby was more compatible with TDD than
Python was.
Hal
···
----- Original Message -----
From: “Michael Campbell” michael_s_campbell@yahoo.com
To: “ruby-talk ML” ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: What’s TOTALLY COMPELLING about Ruby over Python?
If you were to instrument my physical responses and typing rate while
coding using Python and Test Driven Development, and compare them to
my responses using Ruby, you’d get close to assessing the subjective
reason I ain’t going back.
This paragraph intrigues me. Am I misreading, or are you not keen on TDD?
If you were to instrument my physical responses and typing rate while
coding using Python and Test Driven Development, and compare them to
my responses using Ruby, you’d get close to assessing the subjective
reason I ain’t going back.
This paragraph intrigues me. Am I misreading, or are you not keen on TDD?
You probably don’t realize how funny this question is.
If you were to instrument my physical responses and typing rate while
coding using Python and Test Driven Development, and compare them to
my responses using Ruby, you’d get close to assessing the subjective
reason I ain’t going back.
This paragraph intrigues me. Am I misreading, or are you not
keen on TDD?
Maybe I’m wrong, but I thought he was saying
that Ruby was more compatible with TDD than
Python was.
If you were to instrument my physical responses and typing rate while
coding using Python and Test Driven Development, and compare them to
my responses using Ruby, you’d get close to assessing the subjective
reason I ain’t going back.
This paragraph intrigues me. Am I misreading, or are you not keen on TDD?
You probably don’t realize how funny this question is.
OK, in the spirit of community-spiritedness, I’ll take the bait.
If you were to instrument my physical responses and typing rate
while
coding using Python and Test Driven Development, and compare them to
my responses using Ruby, you’d get close to assessing the subjective
reason I ain’t going back.
This paragraph intrigues me. Am I misreading, or are you not keen on
TDD?
You probably don’t realize how funny this question is.
OK, in the spirit of community-spiritedness, I’ll take the bait.
What’s funny about it?
Only that Phlip is one of the most active advocates of TDD on Usenet. Browse
around comp.object or comp.software.extreme-programming and you’ll see what
I mean.
This paragraph intrigues me. Am I misreading, or are you not keen on TDD?
You probably don’t realize how funny this question is.
OK, in the spirit of community-spiritedness, I’ll take the bait.
What’s funny about it?
OK, I’ve heard from some people off-list who explained it to me.
Apparently Phlip is writing a book on TFUI – and, less apparently to
me (because I am acronymically challenged), TFUI is Test First User
Interfaces.
OK, I’ve heard from some people off-list who explained it to me.
Apparently Phlip is writing a book on TFUI – and, less apparently to
me (because I am acronymically challenged), TFUI is Test First User
Interfaces.
IIMSN (it all makes sense now
Shouldn’t that have been IAMSN? Or were you just proving your point about
being acronymically challenged?
OK, I’ve heard from some people off-list who explained it to me.
Apparently Phlip is writing a book on TFUI – and, less apparently to
me (because I am acronymically challenged), TFUI is Test First User
Interfaces.
IIMSN (it all makes sense now
Shouldn’t that have been IAMSN? Or were you just proving your point about
being acronymically challenged?
Groan. I wasn’t trying to prove my point (it was a mistake), but I think
I did prove my point
$ alias acronym="ruby -e ‘puts ARGV[0].split.map {|s| s[0].chr.upcase}.join’ "
$ acronym “Just to be on the safe side…”
JTBOTSS
Shouldn’t that have been IAMSN? Or were you just proving your point about
being acronymically challenged?
Groan. I wasn’t trying to prove my point (it was a mistake), but I think
I did prove my point
–
Daniel Carrera, Math PhD student at UMD. PGP KeyID: 9AF77A88
.-“~~~”-. On the menu of a Swiss restaurant:
/ O O \ “Our wines leave you nothing to hope for”
: s :
\ _/ / Sign outside a Hong Kong tailor shop:
`-._.-’ “Ladies may have a fit upstairs”
OK, I’ve heard from some people off-list who explained it to me.
Apparently Phlip is writing a book on TFUI – and, less apparently to
me (because I am acronymically challenged), TFUI is Test First User
Interfaces.
IIMSN (it all makes sense now
Shouldn’t that have been IAMSN? Or were you just proving your point
about
being acronymically challenged?
Groan. I wasn’t trying to prove my point (it was a mistake), but I think
I did prove my point
$ alias acronym="ruby -e ‘puts ARGV[0].split.map {|s|
s[0].chr.upcase}.join’ "
$ acronym “Just to be on the safe side…”
JTBOTSS
This reminds me of the NDS, the National Society for Dyslexics.
Hal
···
----- Original Message -----
From: dblack@superlink.net
To: “ruby-talk ML” ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: What’s TOTALLY COMPELLING about Ruby over Python?
–
Michael W. Thelen
double value; /* or your money back! /
short changed; / so triple your money back! */
–Larry Wall in cons.c from the perl source code